Teams

Kiwi - Dulay

2025 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-06vs Brevard/Simmons/40&Over3.5MLost 02
L#1 SinglesDavid Norris vs Jyothishkumar Unnikrishnan Nair0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBill Jordan / Thomas Hargrove vs Devin Swanson / Rich HOGARTH4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-06vs Fee - AcquavivaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Bill Jordan vs Ivan Castillo / Juan Restrepo4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDavid Norris / Scott Sanders vs Larry Sellers / Mark Klenck6-1, 6-0
2025-02-27vs RCCB - AboudLost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Tony Famiano vs Santana Luis / Andre Velez0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Norris / Thomas Capuano vs Stephen Aboud / Ernie Wong4-6, 5-7
2025-02-20vs Rockledge - DonovanLost 01
L#1 DoublesSean Murphy / Thomas Hargrove vs Zach Dahl / Jay Amburgey4-6, 3-6
2025-02-05vs RCCB - AboudWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Capuano / Thomas Hargrove vs Angelo Joseph / Anilgowthamkumar Geddam6-4, 6-0
2025-01-30vs Fee - AcquavivaWon 20
W#2 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Ron Dulay vs Larry Sellers / Ruben Diaz6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Norris / Scott Sanders vs Thomas Armstrong / Carl Acquaviva6-4, 6-4
2025-01-16vs Rockledge - DonovanLost 01
L#1 SinglesDavid Norris vs Peter Aude1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Bill Jordan
published 3.5
3.33
Chad Shoultz
published 3.5
3.24
David Norris
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Tony Famiano
published
3.15
Thomas Hargrove
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Thomas Capuano
published
3.13
Ron Dulay
published
3.11
Joseph Schweitzer
published
3.03
Gary Ganiban
published 3.5
Steve Pederson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Hargrove + Joseph Schweitzer1542% games+4.6% vs expected
Thomas Hargrove + Ron Dulay224 matchesnot enough data
David Norris + Tony Famiano134 matchesnot enough data
Ron Dulay + Tony Famiano134 matchesnot enough data
Ron Dulay + Joseph Schweitzer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Jordan
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Chad Shoultz
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
David Norris
35W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Tony Famiano
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.20
Thomas Hargrove
88W–115L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Thomas Capuano
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Ron Dulay
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Joseph Schweitzer
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Gary Ganiban
1W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Steve Pederson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.