Teams

SSLT BLACK

2022 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-15vs CPV REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Whipple / Paul Whipple vs Alex Mercer / Traci Heffron6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdam Burbary / Chrysie Ready vs Mayme McDonald / Brian McDonald5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTanya Harrington / Ryan Burbary vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-08vs LTFC YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Banks / Andrew Banks vs Sandy Biley / KC Agrelius6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Whipple / Paul Whipple vs Krista Vickery / Darren DuPree6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTanya Taylor / Matt Whitmer vs Ashley Agrelius / Rob Conn3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-01vs LTFC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesTanya Harrington / Matt Whitmer vs Selket Allen / Eric Taylor6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChrysie Ready / Adam Burbary vs Sean Allen / Sesha Carbonaro6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChad Whitmer / Rachel Heise vs Azim Khan / Stacey Miller7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-24vs PRKR GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesJD Ready / Chrysie Ready vs Carla Ewing / Nick Fendler6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPaul Whipple / Julie Whipple vs Sally Avery / Alan Simpson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTanya Taylor / Ryan Burbary vs Anne Mills / Jeff Aberle7-5, 6-3
2022-04-18vs CACI GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Banks / Andrew Banks vs Steve Zubowicz / Kim Lysobey2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatt Whitmer / Tanya Harrington vs Julie Clapham / Martin Atlas6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJD Ready / Chrysie Ready vs Kristi Samuelson / Thomas Samuelson6-3, 6-4
2022-04-10vs HRCA BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Banks / Lisa Banks vs Leigh Dunn / Dave Smith3-1
W#2 DoublesChrysie Ready / JD Ready vs Laurni Blanchard / George Schneider6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChad Whitmer / Tanya Harrington vs Rebecca Duque / David Kannikal6-1, 6-3
2022-04-03vs SH GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Whipple / Paul Whipple vs Matthew Zurcher / Dananne Solomon6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTanya Taylor / Matt Whitmer vs Kirklyn Simonton / Doug Dashiell6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChad Whitmer / Rachel Heise vs Holly Strandes / Nick Hinton6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SSLT BLACK6117412137
2LTFC YELLOW43111023179
3JCC YELLOW3381023170
4SSG GOLD34101126202
5RMTC YELLOW3491227204
6LTFC BRONZE3491228213
7LAC ORANGE25101122180
8BRMST NAVY0731838243
9SH GOLD0702142252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Paul Whipple
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.45
Andrew Banks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
JD Ready
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.08
Adam Burbary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Tanya Harrington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.98
Rachel Heise
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Ryan Burbary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Chad Whitmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Tanya Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Matt Whitmer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.39
Julie Whipple
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Chrysie Ready
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Lisa Banks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Whitmer + Tanya Taylor6159% games+14.5% vs expected
Lisa Banks + Andrew Banks22265% games+9.0% vs expected
Paul Whipple + Julie Whipple32565% games+6.4% vs expected
JD Ready + Chrysie Ready262351% games+0.6% vs expected
Rachel Heise + JD Ready6745% games−9.2% vs expected
Adam Burbary + Chrysie Ready1548% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Burbary + Tanya Taylor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Paul Whipple
162W–50L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
4.48
4.5
Andrew Banks
50W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
JD Ready
119W–116L career · 8 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Adam Burbary
52W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
4
Tanya Harrington
37W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
4.04
Rachel Heise
43W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
Ryan Burbary
28W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Chad Whitmer
106W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Tanya Taylor
67W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Matt Whitmer
62W–31L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Julie Whipple
75W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Chrysie Ready
172W–139L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Lisa Banks
33W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.