Teams

SHerring-HR

2025 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-25vs NPike-HVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoelle Romac / Mary Panek vs Mary Hunter / Carolyn Davidson6-3, 6-3
2025-04-04vs KHoekstra-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoelle Romac / Mary Panek vs Pamela Cherry / Karen Sindelar6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2025-03-28vs MLong-ENOWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Panek / Joelle Romac vs Nancy Sickel / Janet Ranheim6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-21vs MParker-YMCALost 01
L#2 DoublesJoelle Romac / Linda Neal vs Lisa Griffin / Jennifer Kuzma2-6, 1-6
2025-03-07vs CBowman-CHCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKarin Yoch / Jennifer Rousseau vs Tina Cunningham / Sara Morgan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Riefkohl / Patty Mathena vs Deon Roach / Monica Jenkins6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy McCorkle / Mary Panek vs Cynthia Cross / Nancy Doorey3-6, 5-7
2025-02-28vs JHagerty-YMCALost 01
L#3 DoublesWendy McCorkle / Joelle Romac vs Katherine Chaney / Donna Newell4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jennifer Rousseau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Sheana Funkhouser
published
3.30
Karin Yoch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Joelle Romac
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Linda Neal
published
2.78
Mary Panek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Sandra Herring
published
2.63
Karen Bordeaux
published
Kaye Culler
published
Nancy Riefkohl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patty Mathena
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy McCorkle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheana Funkhouser + Karin Yoch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Rousseau
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
Sheana Funkhouser
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Karin Yoch
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Joelle Romac
49W–95L career · 5 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Linda Neal
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Mary Panek
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Sandra Herring
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Karen Bordeaux
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Kaye Culler
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Riefkohl
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patty Mathena
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wendy McCorkle
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.