Teams

Haley/55/3.0/MXD/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Mixed 55 & Over · 3.0 Shrev

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-13vs McCotter/55/3.0/MXD/STCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Myers / Susan Jorden vs Kevin McCotter / Heidi Kallenberg6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBob Patterson / Marlene Fontenot vs Cliff Leblanc / Georgia McCotter6-1, 6-3
2026-06-06vs Jeansonne/55/3.0/MXD/QTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesWILLIAM ALLRED / Candace Harris vs Russell Hightower / Mona Cunningham6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Myers / Susan Jorden vs Chris Sampite / Becky Crain5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBob Patterson / Angi Pondell vs Tony Staton / Tammy Rhodes2-6, 6-7
2026-05-30vs Cox/55/3.0/MXD/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCandace Harris / John Myers vs Nancy Devers / Robert Burleson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarole Alexander / Bob Patterson vs Amy Knotts / Rick Holland3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Jorden / Mark Bissell vs Madeline Cummer / Scott Sutton6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-16vs McCotter/55/3.0/MXD/STCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSid Haley / Carole Alexander vs RICK BERUVIDES / Allyson Brooks7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBob Patterson / Angi Pondell vs Gary Pennywell / Jamie Rossi3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMarlene Fontenot / Mark Bissell vs Randy Davidson / Gail Brown6-0, 6-3
2026-05-09vs Jeansonne/55/3.0/MXD/QTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMark Bissell / Carole Alexander vs MLiss Sella / Jimmy Backofen2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSid Haley / Candace Harris vs Michael Doles / Kimberly Smith6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWILLIAM ALLRED / Pam Haley vs Stanley McDonald / Becky Crain6-0, 6-1
2026-05-02vs Cox/55/3.0/MXD/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesCandace Harris / WILLIAM ALLRED vs Madeline Cummer / Mark Roberts1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarlene Fontenot / Steve Brown vs Nancy Devers / Mark Garcia3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPam Haley / Bob Patterson vs Amy Knotts / Rick Holland3-6, 1-6
2026-04-27vs McCotter/55/3.0/MXD/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Bissell / Susan Jorden vs Cliff Leblanc / Susan Adcock6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Brown / Marlene Fontenot vs RICK BERUVIDES / Jennifer Beruvides6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSid Haley / Candace Harris vs Randy Davidson / Shannon Davidson6-2, 6-2
2026-04-18vs Jeansonne/55/3.0/MXD/QTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesWILLIAM ALLRED / Pam Haley vs Tony Staton / Mona Cunningham6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSid Haley / Candace Harris vs Russell Hightower / MLiss Sella3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBob Patterson / Angi Pondell vs Chris Sampite / Debbie Angelo6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-14vs Cox/55/3.0/MXD/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarole Alexander / Mark Bissell vs Myrna Leggett / Mark Garcia4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Jorden / Steve Brown vs Amy Knotts / Mark Roberts3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPam Haley / WILLIAM ALLRED vs Shirley Martin / Rick Holland6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cox/55/3.0/MXD/BTC9023411168
2Haley/55/3.0/MXD/BTC63161127212
3Jeansonne/55/3.0/MXD/QTC36131429245
4McCotter/55/3.0/MXD/STCC0922550316

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Candace Harris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.21
Mark Bissell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.97
WILLIAM ALLRED
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.90
Angi Pondell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Sid Haley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Bob Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Marlene Fontenot
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Pam Haley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Carole Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Susan Jorden
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bob Patterson + Angi Pondell123 matchesnot enough data
Pam Haley + WILLIAM ALLRED213 matchesnot enough data
Candace Harris + Sid Haley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Candace Harris
11W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Mark Bissell
18W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.21
WILLIAM ALLRED
18W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Angi Pondell
2W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Sid Haley
27W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Bob Patterson
10W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Marlene Fontenot
15W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Pam Haley
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Carole Alexander
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Susan Jorden
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.