Teams

Bartone

2025 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 6.0 MX (FRI)

16 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-07vs Stordahl Kelly's HeroesLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Noble / George Esbensen vs Karen Ring / Charles House4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Werner / Paul Bartone vs Jill Sisk / Jeff Sisk2-6, 5-7
2025-02-21vs Dobbins - Mixed NutsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNate Hanes / Barbara Noble vs Tara Swanholm / Joe Swanholm6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPrafulla Bhalekar / Jenna Wykle vs Keith Dobbins / Emily Starita6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShagu Heal / Andrew Heal vs Cory Borthwick / Jim Borthwick Jr6-3, 7-5
2025-01-31vs Thill Tennis TopSpinnersWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Heal / Kathy Roland vs Sean Klein / Marie Stodolka1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesShagu Heal / George Esbensen vs Nathan Thill / Elaine Rasmussen6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPaul Bartone / Barbara Noble vs Robert Olson / Rebecca Thill7-5, 1-0
2025-01-24vs Eidbo 6.0 MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesShagu Heal / George Esbensen vs Jessi Eidbo / Ward Westray3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Ghandour / Joseph Kalugdan vs Abrham Desta / Elizabeth Winberg1-6, 4-6
2025-01-17vs Chase's Aces Mixed Winter 2025Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNate Hanes / Ellen Anderson vs Jonathan Mark / Mary McDermott4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJoseph Kalugdan / Elizabeth Ghandour vs Danielle Stewart / Hugo Westrelin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRandy Roland / Kathy Roland vs Alisa Chase / Ryan Chadderdon5-7, 0-6
2025-01-10vs Stordahl Kelly's HeroesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoseph Kalugdan / Barbara Noble vs Gretchen Schroeder / Josh Kasendorf1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Bartone / Elizabeth Ghandour vs Jenifer Beaudoin / Thomas Olson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Laconic / Prafulla Bhalekar vs Jill Sisk / Jeff Sisk1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 MX (FRI) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Joseph Kalugdan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Shagu Heal
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Nate Hanes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Ellen Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Andrew Heal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Barbara Noble
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Christine Werner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Ghandour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
George Esbensen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jenna Wykle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Laconic
published
Kathy Roland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Laconic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Bartone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Prafulla Bhalekar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Randy Roland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Bartone + Barbara Noble1433% gamesnot enough data
Shagu Heal + Andrew Heal2346% gamesnot enough data
Nate Hanes + Ellen Anderson2348% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Noble + Joseph Kalugdan134 matchesnot enough data
Nate Hanes + Mary Laconic033 matchesnot enough data
Randy Roland + Kathy Roland033 matchesnot enough data
Prafulla Bhalekar + Jenna Wykle213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Kalugdan
29W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Shagu Heal
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Nate Hanes
30W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Ellen Anderson
19W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Andrew Heal
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
2.5
Barbara Noble
3W–9L career · type M · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Christine Werner
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Ghandour
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
George Esbensen
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenna Wykle
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Laconic
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Roland
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Laconic
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paul Bartone
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Prafulla Bhalekar
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Roland
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.