Teams

PBCP CRUZ

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-15vs CSRC MCPHERSONWon 31
W#1 DoublesGuy Cruz / Campbell Hawkins vs Ryan Hill / Russell Walters3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichael Bhagat vs Travis Anderson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrad Matthews / Manuel Briceno vs Tony Adkison / Mike Guinn7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Fipps / Craig Lytle vs Michael White / William Asiano6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-01vs LTFCS CORDASCOLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrad Matthews / Michael Fipps vs Joseph D Sawyer / Ben Lowe4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMichael Bhagat vs Alex Praser1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGuy Cruz / Campbell Hawkins vs Steven Spillers / Keith Logeman0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCraig Lytle / Guillermo Casillas vs MICHAEL REECE / Marc Whorton0-6, 4-6
2026-06-24vs FHCS GUTIERREZLost 13
L#1 DoublesBen Valdez / Guy Cruz vs Steve Shawver / Thomas White6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Fipps vs Layton Mclaughlin1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesManuel Briceno / Brad Matthews vs Dimas Gutierrez / Jason Guzman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGuillermo Casillas / Campbell Hawkins vs Todd Madsen / Paul Reeder6-7, 2-6
2026-06-17vs CCW MICHONSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrad Matthews / Manuel Briceno vs Chris Sabelstrom / David Illsley6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGuy Cruz vs Wayne Mo6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBen Valdez / Campbell Hawkins vs Daniel Michon / Paul Young7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCraig Lytle / Michael Fipps vs George York / Jeff Mailloux6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-10vs MEMPK WOOLLEYWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrad Matthews / Manuel Briceno vs Marshall Leydens / Craig Rogers5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDon Beauvais vs Richard Oskam2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBen Valdez / Adam Roe vs Mikel Bowman / Larry Brachfeld6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCraig Lytle / Guillermo Casillas vs George Woolley / Greg Treviso7-5, 6-4
2026-06-03vs FLYHS JONESLost 13
W#1 DoublesGuy Cruz / Brad Matthews vs Steve Jones / Ken Lane6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMichael Bhagat vs Eric Davis2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCampbell Hawkins / Don Beauvais vs Chase Campbell / Diogo Carvalho5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Lytle / Adam Roe vs Eric Howard / Greg Raymond6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FLYHS JONES6017715188
2LTFCS CORDASCO5116821186
3FHCS GUTIERREZ33141024219
4PBCP CRUZ33111331246
5CSRC MCPHERSON24101432235
6MEMPK WOOLLEY2491532229
7CCW MICHON0671737258

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Guy Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.73
Adam Roe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Campbell Hawkins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Brad Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Ben Valdez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Michael Bhagat
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.67
Don Beauvais
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Craig Lytle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Michael Fipps
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.43
Guillermo Casillas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Guy Cruz + Campbell Hawkins3542% games−2.6% vs expected
Craig Lytle + Brad Matthews224 matchesnot enough data
Craig Lytle + Guillermo Casillas134 matchesnot enough data
Brad Matthews + Michael Fipps134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Bhagat + Adam Roe303 matchesnot enough data
Craig Lytle + Michael Fipps123 matchesnot enough data
Brad Matthews + Ben Valdez033 matchesnot enough data
Ben Valdez + Michael Fipps213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Guy Cruz
13W–21L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Adam Roe
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Campbell Hawkins
4W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Brad Matthews
21W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Ben Valdez
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Michael Bhagat
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Don Beauvais
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Craig Lytle
7W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Michael Fipps
10W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Guillermo Casillas
1W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.