Teams

Honey & Nuts

Mixed 55 & Over- Winter · 8.0 mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-01-14vs El Con DT 55 8.0 MixedLost 12
W#1 DoublesTerry Kirk / Holly Rose vs Linda Groft / Chris Castro5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Rohne / Sandra Tucker vs Michelle Heritage / Christopher Linscott0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLiam Flynn / Jill Duckett vs Linda Haycraft / Robert Garcia0-6, 2-6
2024-01-14vs SAZ/Johnson/55MXD/8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Kirk / Jill Duckett vs Kelley Quinn / Joe Johnson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLiam Flynn / Sandra Tucker vs Michael McMullen / Katie Campbell1-6, 5-7
2024-01-13vs SAZ/Johnson/55MXD/8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Wallen / Holly Rose vs Joel Robison / Debbie Sinagoga4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Rohne / Cindy Madsen vs Cort Alcott / Sally Alcott1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChris Madsen / Sandra Tucker vs Joe Johnson / Kelley Quinn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-01-13vs Play BallWon 21
W#1 DoublesTerry Kirk / Jill Duckett vs Birgit Allmann-Treusch / Dian Li7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJames Wallen / Sandra Tucker vs Lisa Tucci / Scott Bronnimann7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLiam Flynn / Cindy Madsen vs ELISE COTLER / Hans-Georg Treusch4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Chris Madsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
James Wallen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Matthew Rohne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Terry Kirk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Jill Duckett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Cindy Madsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Liam Flynn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Madsen + Chris Madsen91249% games−2.5% vs expected
Cindy Madsen + Matthew Rohne4348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Madsen
190W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
James Wallen
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Rohne
115W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
Terry Kirk
83W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
Jill Duckett
17W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Cindy Madsen
110W–132L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Liam Flynn
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Tucker
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.