Teams

HEIN

2021 Loudoun Doubles Afternoon Winter Women · Doubles Afternoon Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-03-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesYesim Temeemi / Michelle Tenhaeff vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-05vs Zimmerman/KaplanWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Wolff / Sheila Harrell vs Stacey Wood / Rebecah Shepherd6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-04vs LARNER/ HOPKINSLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Larson / Moo Hackett vs Joanne Good / Laura Sagen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Tenhaeff / Karen Gettier vs Jea Lee / Livia Chung4-6, 1-6
2021-02-26vs LARNER/ HOPKINSWon 10
W#3 DoublesYesim Temeemi / Michelle Tenhaeff vs Joanna Schindler / Jea Lee6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Doubles Afternoon Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Moo Hackett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.63
Mary Ann Larson
published
3.43
Sheila Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Lisa Wolff
published
3.29
Michelle Tenhaeff
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.07
Jeannie Matteson
published
2.97
Danielle Davis
published 3.5
2.84
Karen Gettier
published
Julie Kyle
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Moo Hackett
91W–79L career · 1 line in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.90
Mary Ann Larson
10W–16L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Sheila Harrell
132W–87L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
Lisa Wolff
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Michelle Tenhaeff
306W–196L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Jeannie Matteson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Danielle Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
2.97
Karen Gettier
8W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
2.84
Julie Kyle
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.