Teams

SD LLW 7.0 University City RC/ Toda

2022 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter - SD · SD - 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#3 DoublesNATHAN PETERSON / Junko Toda vs Michael Taly / Susie Alvarez6-0, 6-3
2022-03-05vs SD 7.0 University City RC/ ChinLost 01
L#3 DoublesHaruko Vajda / John Torres vs Christopher Lock / Jackie Pelletier5-7, 3-6
2022-02-26vs SD 7.0 Balboa TC/ HarpWon 20
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Jeffrey Hsu vs Christina Khaokham / Soon Chye Ho6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJunko Toda / John Torres vs Cheryle Pillow / John Hubert6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesNahomi Kato / Alexis Akira Toda vs Rafael Salinas / Brandy Baray5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJunko Toda / NATHAN PETERSON vs Nick Runde / Roxana Balboa6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Jeffrey Hsu vs Michelle Alvarez / Kurt Wolfe6-3, 6-4
2022-02-13vs SD 7.0 Mountain View/ SafaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNahomi Kato / Dwight Chen vs Lizette Ferrero / Gerardo de la Concha3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJunko Toda / NATHAN PETERSON vs Alexandra Safa / Pablo de la Lama6-2, 6-0
2022-02-12vs SD 7.0 Peninsula/ GallegoWon 20
W#2 DoublesHaruko Vajda / John Torres vs Judy Janc / Scott Ambrose6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJunko Toda / NATHAN PETERSON vs Lisa Serrano / Richard Schwab6-1, 6-0
2022-02-05vs SD 7.0 Tierrasanta TC/ MaurizWon 10
W#3 DoublesNahomi Kato / Alexis Akira Toda vs Samer Marroki / Danaelle Rodriguez6-2, 6-0
2022-01-08vs SD 7.0 SDT&R/ ChannickWon 21
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Jeffrey Hsu vs Kerry Ott / Jeffrey Russell6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJunko Toda / NATHAN PETERSON vs Robin Maher / Kevin Hopkins6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNahomi Kato / Dwight Chen vs Elizabeth Yu-Hansen / Marc Channick4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Junko Toda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.71
HONG ZEMAN
published 4
3.69
Jeffrey Hsu
published
3.60
Julie Wunderly
published 4
3.50
Haruko Vajda
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.32
John Torres
published
Carolyn Halttunen
published 3.5
2.92
Nahomi Kato
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Junko Toda
246W–88L career · 6 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
HONG ZEMAN
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Jeffrey Hsu
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Julie Wunderly
60W–58L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Haruko Vajda
165W–125L career · 5 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
John Torres
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Carolyn Halttunen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Nahomi Kato
90W–77L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.