Teams

SKINNER - Creighton Farms

2023 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-22vs MARPLE- River CreekWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelanie Skinner / Carolyn Mccarter vs Christie FitzGerald / Madison Humerick6-0, 6-1
2023-05-01vs MARPLE- River CreekWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Stephanie Yarmosh6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-17vs Bixler/ Goodwin- AVSPWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Liliana Michaels6-1, 6-1
2023-03-27vs Barnett/ Chestnut - CascadesWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Effie Hoffman7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Jamie Davis
published
3.33
Carolyn Mccarter
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.64
Maggie Clegg
published
2.44
Britney Beauchemin
published 2.5
2.20
Kelly Ralston
published
2.19
Rebecca McDonald
published
2.14
Tamara Hurney
published
2.12
Tambre Fetzner
published
2.09
Vanessa Moore
published
2.02
Tami Rekas
published
JILL ELKINS
published
Jennie Simpson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Moore + Rebecca McDonald134 matchesnot enough data
Vanessa Moore + Britney Beauchemin213 matchesnot enough data
Vanessa Moore + Tamara Hurney123 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca McDonald + Kelly Ralston033 matchesnot enough data
Tamara Hurney + Tambre Fetzner033 matchesnot enough data
Tamara Hurney + Kelly Ralston033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Davis
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Mccarter
89W–56L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Maggie Clegg
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
2.5
Britney Beauchemin
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%66%34%
2.44
Kelly Ralston
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.20
Rebecca McDonald
9W–24L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19
Tamara Hurney
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.14
Tambre Fetzner
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Vanessa Moore
9W–23L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Tami Rekas
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.02
JILL ELKINS
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennie Simpson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.