Teams

MISSION HILLS 40AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-16vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 40AM3.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnuj Kathuria / David Mayer vs Muthubatcha Purushothaman / Sujith CM6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-15vs BLACKHAWK CC 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Mayer / Eric Zhang vs Rob Culin / Seth Catalli6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-08vs MHTTF/PLEASANTON 40AM3.5EWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Mayer / Leeladhar Agarwal vs Amer Malik / Sundar Thirumalai6-3, 6-1
2025-02-28vs FREMONT TC 40AM3.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesAveer Thakur / David Mayer vs Prathap Kudupu / Vikas Shah6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-16vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5CLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Mayer / Alejandro Angel vs Sathyanand Balan / Santhosh Kumar Kuchoor2-6, 3-6
2025-01-17vs MHTTF/PLEASANTON 40AM3.5EWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnuj Kathuria / David Mayer vs Venkata Vamsi Krishna Dhanikonda / Deepak Ahuja6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-12vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 40AM3.5BWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnuj Kathuria / David Mayer vs Sundeep Kapoor / Allen Yagjian4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesArthur Kwun vs Jiandong Chen6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Aveer Thakur
published 3.5
3.26
Ravindra Rathi
published
David Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.24
Anuj Kathuria
published 3.5
3.24
Leeladhar Agarwal
published
3.17
Arthur Kwun
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.99
Scott Zhang
published
2.78
Alejandro Angel
published 3
2.73
Arnab Guin
published 3
Mark Cornejo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aveer Thakur + Ravindra Rathi314 matchesnot enough data
Anuj Kathuria + Leeladhar Agarwal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aveer Thakur
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Ravindra Rathi
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
David Mayer
120W–122L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Anuj Kathuria
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Leeladhar Agarwal
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Arthur Kwun
36W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Scott Zhang
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Alejandro Angel
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Arnab Guin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Mark Cornejo
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.