Teams

GONZALEZ NUNEZ (Royal Palm)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 55 & Over - Spring · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-02-15vs Keunen (Coral Oaks)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStephen Rigl / Andrew Herron vs Miguel Daud / Geoffrey Meurrens2-6, 2-6
2023-02-08vs Lopez (Riviera Prep)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRalph Martins / Stephen Rigl vs Werner Vondrak / Luis Rodriguez2-6, 3-6
2023-02-01vs Miami-Dade/AlvarezLost 02
L#1 DoublesRalph Martins / Stephen Rigl vs Pedro Zuloaga / George Westring0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Herron / Javier Siu vs Jorge Alberto Rodriguez / DIEGO MUJICA2-6, 3-6
2023-01-25vs Keunen (Coral Oaks)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRaul Moskovitz / Douglas Shapiro vs Mauricio Gomm Santos / Raffaele Quattrocchi2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Rigl / Javier Siu vs Lawrence Freedman / Geoffrey Meurrens2-6, 5-7
2023-01-11vs Miami-Dade/AlvarezLost 02
L#1 DoublesRalph Martins / Douglas Shapiro vs DIEGO MUJICA / Edward Hasegawa5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephen Rigl / Timothy Battle vs Gerardo Perdigon / Jorge Alberto Rodriguez4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Timothy Battle
published
3.54
Ralph Martins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Javier Siu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Tomas Gonzalez
published
3.17
Javier Codeso
published
Douglas Shapiro
published
Gregg Schwartz
published
Raul Moskovitz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Stephen Rigl
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Javier Siu + Tomas Gonzalez0525% games−15.3% vs expected
Javier Siu + Stephen Rigl31438% gamesnot enough data
Ralph Martins + Stephen Rigl2637% gamesnot enough data
Javier Siu + Douglas Shapiro134 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Rigl + Tomas Gonzalez224 matchesnot enough data
Ralph Martins + Javier Siu033 matchesnot enough data
Javier Siu + Javier Codeso033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

JOSE IGNACIO GONZALEZ NUNEZ
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.87
Timothy Battle
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Ralph Martins
33W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
3.54
Javier Siu
65W–114L career · 2 lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.44
Tomas Gonzalez
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.33
Javier Codeso
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.17
Douglas Shapiro
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gregg Schwartz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Raul Moskovitz
28W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephen Rigl
43W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.