Teams

TOC.Rosario-Jansen

2025 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-27vs TING.LowranceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeghan Kofod / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall vs Rita Burgess / Kristen Gallopo6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Stephanie Lee vs Betsy Fulcher / Janet Constantino6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-26vs TOC.AdamsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Diane Adams / Beth Spinarski6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMeghan Kofod / Laurie Compiano vs Pat Rowe / Sally Mauriello5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Theresa Rosario-Jansen vs Celina Morice / Laura Webb-Murrah1-6, 2-6
2025-04-06vs TING.LowranceLost 02
L#2 DoublesTheresa Rosario-Jansen / Meghan Kofod vs Araya Coffey / Stacey Stephens4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPhoebe Hill / Laurie Compiano vs Angela Ray / Amber Bruner4-6, 3-6
2025-03-30vs TOC.AdamsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Lisa Maune vs Heidi Blankenship / Celina Morice3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Jorgelina Stroud vs Diane Adams / Pamela Schoenfeld1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Compiano / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Sally Mauriello / Pat Rowe4-6, 2-6
2025-03-27vs TING.LowranceSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMeghan Kofod / Stacie White vs Marie Gelston / Kristen Gallopo6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStephanie Lee / Suzanne Ruggles vs Jennifer Brock / Tracy Lowrance2-6, 1-6
2025-03-09vs TOC.AdamsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Suzanne Ruggles vs Pat Rowe / Pamela Schoenfeld7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMeghan Kofod / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Diane Adams / Beth Spinarski1-6, 2-6
2025-03-02vs TOC.AdamsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMeghan Kofod / Lisa Maune vs Beth Spinarski / Jane Thrailkill1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Jorgelina Stroud vs Laura Webb-Murrah / Jennifer Hoffmann6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-23vs TING.LowranceLost 02
L#2 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Stephanie Lee vs Marie Gelston / Tracy Lowrance4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Phoebe Hill vs Amber Bruner / Kim Goll4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Elisebeth Gelardi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
CARLA FIELDS
published 3.5
3.33
Lisa Maune
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
3.24
Stacie White
published
3.14
Meghan Kofod
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.91
Cheryl Smyth
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Suzanne Ruggles
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
2.84
Laurene Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Laurie Compiano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Jorgelina Stroud
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Phoebe Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Kofod + Jorgelina Stroud2452% games+18.9% vs expected
Jorgelina Stroud + Suzanne Ruggles181850% games+8.6% vs expected
Suzanne Ruggles + Laurene Fitzgerald151253% games+3.3% vs expected
Meghan Kofod + Laurene Fitzgerald31044% games+3.0% vs expected
Meghan Kofod + Elisebeth Gelardi2547% games−5.3% vs expected
Jorgelina Stroud + Laurene Fitzgerald3941% games−7.8% vs expected
Meghan Kofod + Suzanne Ruggles3546% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Smyth + Suzanne Ruggles3349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elisebeth Gelardi
97W–88L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
CARLA FIELDS
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Lisa Maune
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Stacie White
22W–24L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Meghan Kofod
76W–134L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Cheryl Smyth
212W–231L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Suzanne Ruggles
184W–162L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
Theresa Rosario-Jansen
9W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Laurene Fitzgerald
101W–157L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Laurie Compiano
45W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Jorgelina Stroud
121W–177L career · 7 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Phoebe Hill
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.