Teams

SD 3.0 Coronado TC (2:3)/ Mc Kissick

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.14 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs SD 3.0 Coronado HS (2:3)/ NelsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Mineo / Heidi Nevitt vs Karin Copp / Alisa Dunn7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-17vs SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:2)/ Yu- HansenLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Vineyard / Ana Paula Gonzalez vs Elizabeth Yu-Hansen / Kelly Wilson5-7, 3-6
2023-05-10vs SD 3.0 Mtn View (3:2)/ StanleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Vineyard / Ana Paula Gonzalez vs Yasuko Stanley / Dania Michelle Castillo6-2, 6-2
2023-05-03vs SD 3.0 La Jolla TC (3:2)/ BrunoLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Vineyard / Meagan McKissick vs Sarah Bruno / Jessica Shehab4-6, 5-7
2023-04-26vs SD 3.0 Balboa TC (3:2:)/ ObrochtaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeagan McKissick / Leslie Vineyard vs Peggy Bentley / Anja Dixson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Mineo / Heidi Nevitt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarisa Hackworth / Leslie Vineyard vs Bridget Young / Amy Ragen6-0, 6-1
2023-04-05vs SD LLW 3.0 Peninsula TC/ WoodLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaricarmen Inchaurrandieta / Leslie Vineyard vs Au-Co MAI / Miller McCord3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarisa Hackworth / Miriam Valades vs Lisa Carey / Michelle VANN2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Ana Paula Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.20
Meagan McKissick
published
3.08
Courtney O'Mahoney
published 3.5
2.96
Carisa Hackworth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Leslie Vineyard
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Carla Guastoni
published 3
2.75
Veronica Marti
published
2.74
2.65
Marlis Vermehren
published
2.58
Merrie Mebust
published
2.47
Patricia Padilla
published
2.47
Lucinda Swain
published
2.46
Heidi Nevitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Elizabeth Riebe
published
Kelly Mineo
published
Miriam Valades
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Vineyard + Carisa Hackworth3268% gamesnot enough data
Dianne Lookabaugh + Marlis Vermehren123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ana Paula Gonzalez
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Meagan McKissick
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Courtney O'Mahoney
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Carisa Hackworth
45W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Maricarmen Inchaurrandieta
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Leslie Vineyard
30W–51L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Carla Guastoni
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
2.76
Veronica Marti
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Dianne Lookabaugh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Marlis Vermehren
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
Merrie Mebust
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58
Patricia Padilla
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47
Lucinda Swain
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47
3
Heidi Nevitt
7W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.46
Elizabeth Riebe
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.46
Kelly Mineo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Miriam Valades
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.