Teams

Yadkin/Jennings/18+3.5.3.0.2.5

2026 Yadkin Valley Tri-Level 18 & Over · Women 3.5-3.0-2.5 - Saturday Morning

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-15vs Yadkin/Boone-Tanner/18+3.5.3.0.2.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesMargaret Proegler / Addy Culp vs Nadia Clevenger / Jennifer Jones4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Shamburg / Jennie Smith vs Rebecca Knudsen / Michelle Ford6-1, 6-2
2026-08-08vs Yadkin/Boone-Tanner/18+3.5.3.0.2.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesNatalie Jennings / Carla Hoots vs Rebecca Knudsen / Nadia Clevenger3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAddy Culp / Megan Polson vs Sarah Lycan / Jennifer Jones3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesAddy Culp / Madison Swinson vs Linda Barabasova / Katherine McPherson2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Hoots / Becca Breeden vs Nancy Hart / Lucie Temple3-6, 2-6
2026-08-01vs Yadkin/Townsend/18+3.5.3.0.2.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesCaroline Shamburg / Jennie Smith vs Janess Reyna / Shelly Tuhro6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAddy Culp / Ashley Schmohl vs Patricia AL Phillips / Patricia Townsend6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBetsey Hutton / Jennie Smith vs Michelle Ford / Rebecca Knudsen6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesBetsey Hutton / Laura Harvey vs Nancy Hart / Emelie Patti6-7
L#2 DoublesCaroline Shamburg / Katie Allen vs Dana Alligood / Kristie Moesner4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMegan Polson / Margaret Proegler vs Katherine McPherson / Georgia Hinckley6-4, 6-2
2026-06-27vs Yadkin/Townsend/18+3.5.3.0.2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Watson / Becca Breeden vs Amy Starnes / Nicole Brenner6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie Jennings / Betsey Hutton vs Patricia Townsend / Marguerite Van Zijl6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMadison Swinson / Margaret Proegler vs Sara Meyer / Angela Coburn7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLaura Harvey / Betsey Hutton vs Nancy Hart / Linda Patti7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNatalie Jennings / Carla Hoots vs Melanie Brost / Hillary Stevens0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Proegler / Megan Polson vs Linda Barabasova / Bethany Kerr7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-06vs Yadkin/Townsend/18+3.5.3.0.2.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Wilson / Emily Watson vs Janess Reyna / Blythe Murphy0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Shamburg / Katie Allen vs Carly Rosenkampff / Patricia Townsend6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAddy Culp / Ashley Schmohl vs Patricia AL Phillips / Chandler Jasperse6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 3.5-3.0-2.5 - Saturday Morning
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yadkin/Georgitis/FCC/18+3.5.3.0.2.58020411154
2Yadkin/Jennings/18+3.5.3.0.2.554131431247
3Yadkin/Boone-Tanner/18+3.5.3.0.2.52691532232
4Yadkin/Townsend/18+3.5.3.0.2.51651634214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Watson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Becca Breeden
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.03
Jennie Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Carla Hoots
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Katie Allen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Betsey Hutton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Caroline Shamburg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ashley Schmohl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Megan Polson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Margaret Proegler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.13
Addy Culp
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.04
Madison Swinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Natalie Jennings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Shamburg + Jennie Smith8359% games+11.9% vs expected
Katie Allen + Becca Breeden033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Watson
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Becca Breeden
5W–12L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.09
Jennie Smith
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Carla Hoots
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Katie Allen
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Betsey Hutton
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Caroline Shamburg
16W–10L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
2.5
Ashley Schmohl
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Polson
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Margaret Proegler
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Addy Culp
3W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Madison Swinson
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Natalie Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.