← Teams

ETC-Janson

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.37 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-13vs PSC-Azure-PetriucWon 3–1
W#1 DoublesCarly Baker / Courtney Meyer vs Monica Boris / Sanda Morea6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesNicole Janson vs Beatrice Oltean7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Kocher / Jenni Lesirge vs Smaranda Lieuallen / Alina Stanciu2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Miller / Julie Kestle-Smith vs Dana Cozmei / Alina Bibireata7-6, 7-6
2022-03-06vs BETC-Wu 3.0WWon 4–0
W#1 DoublesSarah Christie / Jamie Carr vs Becky Crain / In Young Jung3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarly Baker vs Martha Shefveland6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Schroeder / Lisa Hagan vs Juliet Wu / Debbie Dymarkowski6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJenni Volk / Kimberly Miller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-26vs HBSQ-DonnellyWon 3–1
W#1 DoublesNicole Janson / Melissa Blair vs Kathryn Swingle / Sarah Chandler7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCarly Baker vs Kelly Barry6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJenni Lesirge / Courtney Meyer vs Jenny Wright / Darla Schlumberger4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Schulz / Sarah Duffy vs Mandi Counter / Darla Donnelly3-6, 3-6
2022-02-11vs AYTC-Terminetters 2022-BienhoffWon 3–1
W#1 DoublesCarly Baker / Courtney Meyer vs Priscilla Cypiot / Leslie Vigil6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKimberly Miller vs Annabella Chiocco2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJamie Carr / Nicole Janson vs Holly Hovey / Michele Sevart6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Kocher / Jenni Lesirge vs Kelly Yukevich / Stephanie Hill7-5, 6-3
2022-02-06vs ETC-Sharks-TarteWon 4–0
W#1 DoublesNicole Janson / Kimberly Kocher vs Anne Holland / Julita Eleveld3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarly Baker vs Nicole Hardie6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Christie / Jenni Volk vs Elise Spencer / Sheila Connolly7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKimberly Miller / Melissa Blair vs Liesl Langley / Katherine Cardinal6-2, 6-4
2022-01-28vs TCSP-ReudinkSplit 2–2
W#1 DoublesCarly Baker / Nicole Janson vs Daisy Cullop / Shannon Poll6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKimberly Miller vs Sinead ODonovan0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMelissa Blair / Kimberly Kocher vs Mikhaila Reudink / Erin Kennedy6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Kestle-Smith / Anne Schulz vs Jane Saddler / Christine Livesay4-6, 2-6
2022-01-22vs FC-Lioness Den-CalpeLost 1–3
W#1 DoublesJenni Lesirge / Kimberly Kocher vs Jill LaRosa / Teresa Cueto6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Janson vs Beth Donnelly6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Joffe / Lisa Schroeder vs Elaine Hoy / Chris Gonzales2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Duffy / Julie Kestle-Smith vs Jane Shively / Homa Assefi3-6, 2-6
2022-01-15vs BC-Tursa/AndersonWon 3–1
W#1 DoublesJenni Volk / Lisa Hagan vs Adina Friedman / Carrie Browne6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNicole Janson vs Ellen Yoon6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCourtney Meyer / Beth Joffe vs Myoungju Baek / Leigh Staddon-Smith7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Christie / Sarah Duffy vs Amy Franck / Shera Myers6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings32 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PL-Volley Girls-Wate81231328279
2ETC-Janson7123924245
3TCSP-Reudink62221021255
4BC-Bloch 3.0W6224826266
5ETC-Serve It Up II-Swiftney62211128241
6AYTC-Double Shots-Hofler62211129295
7ETC-Sharks-Tarte62191331267
8PSC-Lu63221431259
9CP-Victorious Secret-Goldberg63221431281
10CAC/SL-Coley63221431297
11BC-Tursa/Anderson53211129265
12CAC/SL-Smith53201234295
13MI-Crump53131941302
14TCSP-Down The Line-Buscher54231332297
15MC-Jay 3.0W54241233306
16CP-Central Perk-Wong54191739310
17HBSQ-Donnelly44181433261
18BAIN-Wolffe44181434285
19EDG-Wilson/Ketefian44131940294
20AYTC-Team Awesome Fun-Lu/Lusty45152146355
21RBW-Gibson45142249331
22BETC-Porter/Ikeda 202235151741319
23PSC-Azure-Petriuc35131943312
24FC-Lioness Den-Calpe35122043318
25NTC-Steck3692755379
26AYTC-DeGeorge26122045325
27AYTC-Terminetters 2022-Bienhoff2692350339
28EDG-Higgins/Keller27162048372
29BETC-Smash It-Truong27132350374
30BC-Make a racket-Leahy27122452372
31BETC-Wu 3.0W0872553348
32BTA-Day 3.0W0882455367

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Nicole Janson
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.53
Kimberly Kocher
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Jamie Carr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Melissa Blair
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Carly Baker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Beth Joffe
published 3.5
3.15
Jenni Volk
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Courtney Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Anne Schulz
published 3.5
2.98
Sarah Duffy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Sarah Christie
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Kimberly Miller
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
—
Jenni Lesirge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Lisa Hagan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.35
Julie Kestle-Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Lisa Schroeder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Kocher + Courtney Meyer15–267% games+18.4% vs expected
Jamie Carr + Nicole Janson10–362% games+16.5% vs expected
Courtney Meyer + Nicole Janson8–458% games+11.3% vs expected
Carly Baker + Courtney Meyer9–160% games+10.8% vs expected
Jenni Volk + Melissa Blair8–160% games+8.3% vs expected
Kimberly Kocher + Nicole Janson4–150% games+7.4% vs expected
Lisa Hagan + Sarah Duffy3–258% games+5.3% vs expected
Sarah Christie + Sarah Duffy7–255% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nicole Janson
90W–50L career · type A · 8 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Kimberly Kocher
84W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Jamie Carr
53W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Melissa Blair
53W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Carly Baker
101W–67L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Beth Joffe
27W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Jenni Volk
33W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Courtney Meyer
61W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Anne Schulz
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Sarah Duffy
33W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Sarah Christie
33W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Kimberly Miller
95W–111L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Jenni Lesirge
19W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
—
3
Lisa Hagan
50W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Julie Kestle-Smith
32W–97L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.35
—
Lisa Schroeder
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.