Teams

Westwood- Mullahy Thunderstruck

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-09-14vs Monacan HS BrodLost 01
L#3 DoublesJames Mullahy / Yancey Jones vs Ryan Harris / SIMON MIRANOWICZ2-6, 2-6
2024-08-18vs Wyndham - HouffLost 01
L#1 DoublesYancey Jones / Peyton Bowman vs Brad Houff / Kaushik Narasimhan6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Yancey Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Peyton Bowman
published
3.78
Jacob Dyer
published
3.75
Chris Gerecke
published 4
3.69
Thomas Leftwich
published
3.66
Sean DiBlasi
published
3.63
Wes Valentine
published
3.57
Brian Holder
published 3.5
3.57
Dutch Jones
published
3.37
Frank Payne
published
3.37
James Mullahy
published
3.32
George Brickley
published
3.30
John Martin
published
3.25
Jeff Hause
published
3.15
Robert Teele
published
3.12
Robert Nilson
published
Mike Whitaker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Gerecke + Jacob Dyer1540% games−12.2% vs expected
Chris Gerecke + Peyton Bowman213 matchesnot enough data
Jacob Dyer + Sean DiBlasi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yancey Jones
89W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
Peyton Bowman
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Jacob Dyer
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Chris Gerecke
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Thomas Leftwich
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Sean DiBlasi
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Wes Valentine
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Brian Holder
27W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.57
Dutch Jones
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.57
Frank Payne
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.37
James Mullahy
22W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
George Brickley
13W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
John Martin
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.30
Jeff Hause
10W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Robert Teele
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Robert Nilson
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Mike Whitaker
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.