Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Hills-McManus

2021 Winter League-Saturday · 3.5W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.79 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-04-03vs CMTA @ Liberty Hills-TaylorWon 21
L#1 DoublesSophie Bellina / Jan Watts vs Mindi Paskins / Shoeleh Assemi2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlessandra Nolan / Regen McManus vs Claudine Finlay / Karen Rozsa6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatie Leikin / Sandra Clark vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-27vs Ivory Ridge-PatchWon 21
L#1 DoublesCharli Franco / Hayley Pratt vs Andi Johnson / Bessy Nielson2-6, 2-5
W#2 DoublesSandra Clark / Jennifer Kane vs Marilyn Patch / Ashley Bailey6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRegen McManus / Hayley Shaffer vs Jennifer Wells / Heather Cottrell7-6, 4-2
2021-03-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlessandra Nolan / Regen McManus vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-21vs CMTA @ Liberty Hills-DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharli Franco / Hayley Pratt vs Elaine Day / Lexi Stokes6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatie Leikin / Jennifer Kane vs Melanie Decker / Rebecca Harman6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJan Watts / Sophie Bellina vs Sarah Law / Lynley Hogan7-5, 0-2, 1-0
2021-03-13vs CMTA @ Oak Hills-Sampson/SwensenLost 12
L#1 DoublesHayley Pratt / Charli Franco vs Amy Earl / Katie Swensen3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Clark / Beth Iucker vs Mary Kathryn Harman / Gretel Sampson4-6, 4-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJan Watts / Katie Leikin vs Melissa Ford / Lisa Stebbing3-6, 5-6
2021-03-08vs CMTA @ Liberty Hills-Warren/ScheyLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlessandra Nolan / Regen McManus vs Kristi Warren / Elaine Hansen1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHayley Shaffer / Sandra Clark vs Sarah Love / Malisa Bowen1-6, 1-6
2021-03-06vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlessandra Nolan / Ashley Korchyk vs Brenda Fowler / Cary Jones6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesRegen McManus / Hayley Shaffer vs Karla Block / Kathrine Wright0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Clark / Katie Leikin vs Tracie Cooper / Jennie Stacey3-6, 3-5
L#3 DoublesCharli Franco / Hayley Pratt vs LaNece Andreason / Mary Sorensen3-6, 4-5
2021-02-06vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlessandra Nolan / Regen McManus vs Brenda Fowler / Cary Jones6-7, 1-3
2021-02-06vs Cottonwood Club-AndoLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlessandra Nolan / Beth Iucker vs Regan Tieff / Lori Briesacher7-6, 0-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlison Pearce / Jan Watts vs Rachel Mcillece / Beata Kieffer1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Leikin / Sophie Bellina vs Kiki Wai Sindad / Laurie Costello6-4, 1-5, 0-1
2021-01-30vs CMTA @ Wasatch Hills-CarruthersWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandra Clark / Alessandra Nolan vs Julie Berg / Julie Jones6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHayley Shaffer / Charli Franco vs Crystal Richardson / Anne Gray4-6, 0-5
W#3 DoublesKatie Leikin / Jan Watts vs Janine Piper / Shelly Kemp6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Alessandra Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.83
Charli Franco
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Hayley Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Katie Leikin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.06
Alison Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Hayley Shaffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Sophie Bellina
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jan Watts
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Jennifer Kane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Regen McManus
published
Sandra Clark
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charli Franco + Hayley Pratt10551% games−0.3% vs expected
Alessandra Nolan + Sandra Clark314 matchesnot enough data
Jan Watts + Katie Leikin123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Kane + Sandra Clark213 matchesnot enough data
Katie Leikin + Sophie Bellina033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alessandra Nolan
93W–60L career · 7 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
4.15
4
Charli Franco
101W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Hayley Pratt
47W–37L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Katie Leikin
104W–125L career · 6 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Alison Pearce
171W–202L career · 1 line in 2021
32%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Hayley Shaffer
77W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Sophie Bellina
41W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jan Watts
15W–53L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Kane
29W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Regen McManus
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandra Clark
19W–33L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.