Teams

GOG SARTAIN

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-07-13vs PBTC ROMANWon 10
W#2 DoublesHarold Fong / Michael Sartain vs Kurt Thalhamer / Michael Bhagat7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Adams / Michael Sartain vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-11vs FLYHS BURNETTLost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Enterman / Michael Sartain vs Keshav Channarayappa / Aditya Sathe4-6, 3-6
2021-06-08Won 10
W#1 SinglesHarold Fong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Chris Enterman
published 4.5
Christopher Stumm
published 4.5
4.23
Frank Coyle
published 4.5
4.21
Jared May
published
4.17
Mike Peterson
published
3.98
Harold Fong
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.90
Michael Sartain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
David Adams
published 4.5
Kris Kaltenbacher
published
Kurt Chan
published
Mike Pennell
published
Philip Weston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Peterson + Chris Enterman5359% games+8.7% vs expected
Christopher Stumm + Frank Coyle2445% games−3.2% vs expected
Christopher Stumm + Kris Kaltenbacher213 matchesnot enough data
Kris Kaltenbacher + Frank Coyle033 matchesnot enough data
Kris Kaltenbacher + Kurt Chan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Enterman
89W–34L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
4.49
4.5
Christopher Stumm
15W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Frank Coyle
73W–54L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
Jared May
40W–27L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
4.21
Mike Peterson
51W–29L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Harold Fong
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
3.98
Michael Sartain
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.90
4.5
David Adams
12W–12L career · no lines in 2021
99%1%<1%
3.69
Kris Kaltenbacher
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kurt Chan
11W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike Pennell
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Philip Weston
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.