Teams

Chase's Aces Women

2025 ONE Doubles SPRING · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlisa Chase / Karen Kasner vs Anh Nguyen / Abby Lang6-2, 7-5
2025-04-17vs Fisk - Gall Spring 25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary McDermott / Karen Kasner vs Lucy Fisk / Ally Gall2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-15vs Foster/BensonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlisa Chase / Mary McDermott vs Gretchen Foster / Katie Benson2-6, 3-6
2025-03-25vs Jopke/HultmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlisa Chase / Mary McDermott vs Allison Jopke / Kathleen Hultman2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Mary McDermott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Alisa Chase
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Kasner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alisa Chase + Mary McDermott2347% games+4.1% vs expected
Alisa Chase + Karen Kasner2549% games−1.3% vs expected
Karen Kasner + Mary McDermott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary McDermott
31W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Alisa Chase
21W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Karen Kasner
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.