Teams

CWincek/WParker (Queens)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Women - Mon PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 8:00 PM
vs
Queens Sports Complex at Marion Diehl Park
Sep 21 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Cassandra WincekWendy Parker
Sep 27 5:00 PM
vs
Queens Sports Complex at Marion Diehl Park
Sep 28 6:30 PM
vs
Queens Sports Complex at Marion Diehl Park
Oct 4 5:00 PM
vs
Queens Sports Complex at Marion Diehl Park
Oct 5 6:30 PM
vs
Queens Sports Complex at Marion Diehl Park
Oct 12 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Cassandra WincekWendy Parker
2026-09-01vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMeredith Benson / Madeline Weih vs Sydney Weinberg / Cynthia Brinneman1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Horn / Jennifer Watson vs Darri Thayaprasat / Sarah Cimmino2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Marthinsen / Hannah Chillag vs Brittany Simpson / Lindsey Stuckey5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-24vs DWest (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Marthinsen / Maria Emilia de la Orden vs Callie Schmit / Toni Laney6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCaroline Boger / Cassandra Wincek vs Samantha Danesis / Lina Clarke6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessica Mauney / Irma Laney vs Kindell Schmitt / Madison Lohnes6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-17vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Horn / Caroline Boger vs Carson Rose Tennyson / Becky Tennyson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Benson / Madeline Weih vs Darri Thayaprasat / Caroline Frank2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Watson / Jessica Mauney vs Jackie Gaine / Cynthia Brinneman4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Women - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DThayaprasat (Queens)1030015
2DWest (Queens)000000
3CWincek/WParker (Queens)0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Cassandra Wincek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.41
Hannah Chillag
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Caroline Boger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.33
Jessica Mauney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Maria Emilia de la Orden
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.14
Irma Laney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.12
Madeline Weih
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Myriam Sarment
published
Meredith Benson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Marthinsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Horn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wendy Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Emilia de la Orden + Hannah Chillag303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cassandra Wincek
102W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.55
4.5
Hannah Chillag
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Caroline Boger
33W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
4.34
Jessica Mauney
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
4.33
Maria Emilia de la Orden
36W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Irma Laney
42W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.14
Madeline Weih
24W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.12
Myriam Sarment
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Meredith Benson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Marthinsen
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Horn
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Parker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.