Teams

CCC-Sosebee

2025 NEGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Women 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.43 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-12vs Chateau-WattsWon 31
W#1 DoublesLindsey McCamy / Pamela Jackson vs Christine McClendon / Jennifer Fuller6-3, 6-7, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSherri Frankum vs Erica Cahoon6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKim Reeves / AMANDA NORTON vs Sonya Watts / Michelle Calvert4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesClaudia Kempen / Jeanne Lewis vs Sandra Gardner / April Giometti6-1, 5-7, 7-5
2025-03-11vs NEGTA/Elcira PinkertonLost 23
W#1 DoublesLindsey McCamy / Pamela Jackson vs Elcira Pinkerton / Pamela McBride6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAmanda Watkins vs Brandy Bailey6-2, 5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShonda Sosebee / Kim Reeves vs Mary Bell / Erin Grill1-6, 7-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesClaudia Kempen / Jeanne Lewis vs Joy Carr / Cheryl Dorfeld3-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesAmy Pope / Stacy King vs Patsy Greer / TAMARA MAELLARO7-6, 6-1
2025-02-05vs Chateau-WattsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Pope / Pamela Jackson vs Liz Murphy / Heide Rudnick6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAmanda Watkins vs Erica Cahoon4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Allenbach / Jennifer Loggins vs Sonya Watts / Michelle Calvert6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesShonda Sosebee / Kim Reeves vs Sandra Gardner / Jennifer Fuller6-3, 2-6, 5-7
2025-01-29vs NEGTA/Elcira PinkertonLost 23
L#1 DoublesPamela Jackson / Jennifer Loggins vs Erin Grill / Joy Carr6-3, 2-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Watkins vs Brandy Bailey3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAMANDA NORTON / Kim Reeves vs Mary Bell / Stephanie Figueroa6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJeanne Lewis / Alycea Hylton vs Elcira Pinkerton / Patsy Greer6-2, 2-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesStacy King / Sherry Brock vs Jan Hunter / Alice Beach6-3, 3-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Danielle Allenbach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Amy Pope
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Amanda Watkins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Jennifer Loggins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Sherri Frankum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Alycea Hylton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Amber Carter
published 3.5
3.18
AMANDA NORTON
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Pamela Jackson
published
3.17
Kim Reeves
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Jeanne Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Shonda Sosebee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Claudia Kempen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Sherry Brock
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey McCamy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stacy King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

AMANDA NORTON + Kim Reeves7353% games+5.0% vs expected
Shonda Sosebee + AMANDA NORTON2345% games+3.2% vs expected
Jennifer Loggins + Danielle Allenbach13456% games+2.3% vs expected
Amy Pope + Kim Reeves3550% games−0.1% vs expected
Jeanne Lewis + Sherry Brock1444% games−1.8% vs expected
Jeanne Lewis + Claudia Kempen1542% games−3.4% vs expected
AMANDA NORTON + Danielle Allenbach224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Loggins + Kim Reeves213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Allenbach
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Amy Pope
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Amanda Watkins
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Jennifer Loggins
42W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Sherri Frankum
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Alycea Hylton
12W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Amber Carter
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
AMANDA NORTON
18W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Pamela Jackson
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Kim Reeves
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jeanne Lewis
33W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Shonda Sosebee
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
3
Claudia Kempen
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Sherry Brock
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Lindsey McCamy
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy King
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.