Teams

McManus (FWBTC)

2023 OWB Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesTricia Hafdahl / Dodi Stringfellow vs Megan Sherman / Jennifer Schweikert6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMikaela McManus / Van Hughes vs Dianna Dylewski / Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-12-04vs Stowers (BlueWater Bay)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMikaela McManus / Van Hughes vs Andrea Moneymaker / Allison Phillips6-1, 6-3
2023-11-08vs Stowers (BlueWater Bay)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMikaela McManus / Dodi Stringfellow vs Jolyn Curtis / TRACY STOWERS6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-11-04vs Okalossa/Garfield/Combo18&Over7.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesWhitney Sumrall / Cherie Tan vs Jennifer Lord / Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesVan Hughes / Ive Marsach vs Dianna Dylewski / Kassia Garfield2-6, 3-6
2023-10-30vs Stowers (BlueWater Bay)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTricia Hafdahl / Dodi Stringfellow vs Kimberly Mathers / Elisabeth Sherwin6-2, 6-0
2023-10-27vs Okalossa/Garfield/Combo18&Over7.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesCherie Tan / Tricia Hafdahl vs Moya Peterson / Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Tricia Hafdahl
published
3.91
Mikaela McManus
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.89
Ive Marsach
published 4
3.77
Sophie Rudman
published
3.64
Whitney Sumrall
published
3.43
Cherie Tan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Van Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kris Pritchard
published
Patricia Leahy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Tan + Dodi Stringfellow361560% games−3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tricia Hafdahl
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
4.06
Mikaela McManus
81W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Ive Marsach
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
Sophie Rudman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Whitney Sumrall
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Van Hughes
84W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Kris Pritchard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Leahy
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.