Teams

De.Byrd18S3.0

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-15vs Ma.Morriston18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesPearson Wynands vs Andrew Sonnier6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMatthew Givens vs Vijayanand Periannan6-0, 6-4
W#3 SinglesDonzell Newkirk vs Theo Wagner6-1, 6-2
2026-07-01vs Br.McLean18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesDennis Byrd Jr vs Mike Hampton7-5, 6-3
2026-06-24vs Pa.Vickers18S3.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRyan Givens vs Christian Guthrie0-6, 1-6
2026-06-17vs Ro.Harris18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesRyan Givens vs Danny Yoder7-5, 6-0
L#3 SinglesDennis Byrd Jr vs Len Swanson6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-10vs Ch.Nystrom18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesPaul Sherman vs Clay Parker5-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesConnor Brady vs Scott Clark4-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesMatthew Givens vs Patrick Webb2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-27vs Ma.Morriston18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesMatthew Givens vs Surin Patel7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPaul Sherman vs Christopher Leonard6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesRyan Givens vs Theo Wagner6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Pearson Wynands
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.97
Paul Sherman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.93
Matthew Givens
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.91
Ryan Givens
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.90
Dennis Byrd Jr
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.77
Gary George
published
Connor Brady
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Donzell Newkirk
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Byrd Jr + Ryan Givens7268% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pearson Wynands
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Paul Sherman
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
Matthew Givens
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Ryan Givens
61W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Dennis Byrd Jr
138W–89L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
Gary George
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Connor Brady
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Donzell Newkirk
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.