Teams

FCCC GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

15 players · average NTRP 3.08 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-30vs LTWon 20
W#2 DoublesEvie Hoeven / Michelle Kennedy vs Cristine Carpenter / Leslie Walker7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJane Schmelzle vs Teri Ouar6-1, 6-2
2022-05-16vs MLF BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Schmelzle / Shanti Green vs Kathy Carlson / Jacalyn Petersen6-0, 7-6
2022-05-09vs MLF YELLOWLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Kennedy / Teresa Nugent vs Diane Erickson / Susan Prentice1-6, 1-6
2022-04-25vs HMTCSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJane Schmelzle vs MELISSA PHARR7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlison Morgan / Michelle Kennedy vs Vivian Watson / Ingrid Parsons3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Jane Schmelzle
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Hilary McCart
published 3.5
2.79
Michelle Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Alison Morgan
published 3
2.73
Catherine Orr
published 3
2.58
Sherry McCoy
published
2.58
Shanti Green
published
2.35
Teresa Nugent
published
Christina Baker
published 2.5
Evie Hoeven
published
Jackie Spradley
published
Laurie Hittesdorf
published
Maureen Bee
published
Nancy Hartley
published
Pam Raab
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry McCoy + Jackie Spradley3250% games+4.0% vs expected
Sherry McCoy + Michelle Kennedy10353% games+3.3% vs expected
Shanti Green + Michelle Kennedy1742% games−7.2% vs expected
Teresa Nugent + Michelle Kennedy0522% games−8.7% vs expected
Shanti Green + Jane Schmelzle4163% gamesnot enough data
Shanti Green + Sherry McCoy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jane Schmelzle
68W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Hilary McCart
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Michelle Kennedy
67W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Alison Morgan
21W–37L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Catherine Orr
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Sherry McCoy
20W–24L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
Shanti Green
38W–27L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
Teresa Nugent
17W–50L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.35
2.5
Christina Baker
13W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Evie Hoeven
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jackie Spradley
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laurie Hittesdorf
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Bee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Hartley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Raab
0W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.