Teams

Fair Oaks Controlled Chaos

2024 18 & Over Fall Weekday Women - NA · 3.5 Monday

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
JESSICA Sills
published
3.60
Melanie Rossi
published
3.54
Brigid Beck
published 4
3.52
Alison Leonard
published 3.5
3.49
Lisa Spalla
published
3.44
Maryann Burdick
published
3.43
Patti Barron
published
3.38
Carrie Ervin
published 3.5
3.36
Yvonne Uhl
published
3.36
Amy Hall
published 3.5
3.34
Barbara Vance
published 3.5
3.31
Susan Daum
published
3.30
Paula Sachse
published
3.27
Michelle Pettit
published
3.18
Michelle Sagray
published
3.17
Jordan Waldrip
published
3.15
Jaime Barrera
published
3.13
Kelly Grossman
published
3.11
Stephanie Fargo
published
3.11
Christa Maxwell
published 3.5
2.99
Sarah Faulkenberry
published
2.97
Brenda Worsham
published 3
Ruthann Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Vance + Paula Sachse3250% games+6.4% vs expected
Maryann Burdick + Paula Sachse9362% games+5.7% vs expected
Kelly Grossman + Michelle Pettit5454% games+5.0% vs expected
Barbara Vance + Yvonne Uhl7163% games+4.6% vs expected
Michelle Pettit + Susan Daum4351% games+1.3% vs expected
Melanie Rossi + Carrie Ervin5552% games−4.0% vs expected
Kelly Grossman + JESSICA Sills134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Daum + Paula Sachse134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

JESSICA Sills
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Melanie Rossi
22W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
4
Brigid Beck
15W–20L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Alison Leonard
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Lisa Spalla
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Maryann Burdick
43W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Patti Barron
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Carrie Ervin
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Yvonne Uhl
30W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Amy Hall
19W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Barbara Vance
26W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Susan Daum
17W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Paula Sachse
27W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Michelle Pettit
34W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Michelle Sagray
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Jordan Waldrip
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jaime Barrera
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Kelly Grossman
13W–24L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Stephanie Fargo
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Christa Maxwell
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sarah Faulkenberry
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Brenda Worsham
35W–49L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Ruthann Johnson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.