Teams

Sunset Depoach Mode

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Ina Kim
published
3.39
SANDI WISE
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.31
Inna Skripnikova
published
3.24
Kate Centanni
published
3.24
Isabella Richards
published
3.24
Judy Eisenbrand
published
3.23
Dana Lawrence
published 3.5
3.22
Pam Schuberg
published
3.14
Gina Vazquez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Keressa Garland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.06
Deborah Cassar
published 3.5
3.00
Tanya Thompson
published
2.96
Leah Cassar
published
2.96
Marie Smith
published
2.89
Claudia Bay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
JANE HUANG
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Smith + Pam Schuberg4157% games+3.1% vs expected
Keressa Garland + Claudia Bay2446% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Bay + Gina Vazquez044 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Claudia Bay213 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Tanya Thompson033 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Gina Vazquez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
SANDI WISE
187W–162L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Inna Skripnikova
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Kate Centanni
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Isabella Richards
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Judy Eisenbrand
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Dana Lawrence
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Pam Schuberg
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Gina Vazquez
95W–140L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
3
Keressa Garland
88W–113L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.08
3.5
Deborah Cassar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Tanya Thompson
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Leah Cassar
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Marie Smith
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Claudia Bay
67W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
JANE HUANG
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.