Teams

Huskey -Faulkner

2025 NETX Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-10vs Cowden/Douglas- WillowbrookLost 23
L#1 DoublesDeborah Lowe / Deedee Keener vs Olivia Heaton / Mary Knight5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMary Kolder vs Kensie Cowden4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRhonda Davis / Simone James vs Shelby Burkett / Brooke Swann6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKimberly Henry vs Lisa Douglas4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Gray / Joyce Mallory vs Marcela Woodall / Kasey Boatright6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-07vs Cowden/Douglas- WillowbrookLost 14
L#1 DoublesJennifer Gray / Kimberly Henry vs Marcela Woodall / Jennifer White6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMary Kolder vs Kasey Boatright6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJoyce Mallory / Deedee Keener vs Lisa Douglas / Kensie Cowden5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKristi Huskey vs Holly Freeman1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTeresa Jasinski / Deborah Lowe vs Ellen Pierce / Mary Knight1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-20vs Anderson - TASCLost 14
W#1 DoublesKimberly Henry / Jennifer Gray vs Jenny Leavitt / Jill Johnson7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMary Kolder vs Anastasiya Nosova1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristi Huskey / Teresa Jasinski vs Katie Socia / Jillian Abernathy1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDiana Norwood vs Kathryn Glenn6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSimone James / Rhonda Davis vs Ashley Reed / Adrianne Miller1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-13vs Hill/Sherrell - FaulknerLost 23
L#1 DoublesJoyce Mallory / Deedee Keener vs Sherrie Lewis / Katy Hill2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMary Kolder vs Lauren Mayer6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSnizhana Zhdanova / Jennifer Gray vs Melissa Barrett / Jaclyn Sherrell3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDiana Norwood vs Sarah Oellermann2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKristi Huskey / Kimberly Henry vs Sherry Willis / Alisa Simmons6-2, 6-2
2025-04-15vs Anderson - TASCLost 23
L#1 DoublesJennifer Gray / Teresa Jasinski vs Anastasiya Nosova / Chesle Blair4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMary Kolder vs Jillian Abernathy0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Henry / Kelly Michaels vs Ashley Reed / Rebecca Dunn6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDiana Norwood vs Beth Dennis5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSimone James / Deborah Lowe vs Amy Guthrie / Jessica Helgesen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Hill/Sherrell - FaulknerWon 32
W#1 DoublesJoyce Mallory / Deedee Keener vs Lisa Losack / Christina Nunez6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDiana Norwood vs Katy Hill6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSnizhana Zhdanova / Jennifer Gray vs Laurie Billings / Aimee Krog4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMary Kolder vs Jill Hamil4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Jasinski / Rhonda Davis vs Ann Skogerboe / Jaclyn Sherrell6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Joyce Mallory
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Deedee Keener
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Kelly Michaels
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Deborah Lowe
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Kimberly Henry
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.20
Diana Norwood
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.11
Kristi Huskey
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Simone James
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Snizhana Zhdanova
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Teresa Jasinski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Mary Kolder
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Jennifer Gray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Jasinski + Kristi Huskey101047% games+4.6% vs expected
Deedee Keener + Joyce Mallory17560% games+1.4% vs expected
Deborah Lowe + Deedee Keener5160% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Lowe + Teresa Jasinski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Mallory
26W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Deedee Keener
24W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Kelly Michaels
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Deborah Lowe
17W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kimberly Henry
24W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Diana Norwood
10W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Kristi Huskey
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Simone James
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Snizhana Zhdanova
33W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Teresa Jasinski
20W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Mary Kolder
4W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jennifer Gray
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.