Teams

Ambrose/Knoxville

2025 Mixed 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Mixed 18&over

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-20vs Parks/ScottWon 30
W#1 DoublesPearl Jhala / Jack Slonecker vs Andy Crook / Jennifer Crook6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrooke Govert / Jake Abernathy vs Daniel Park / Brook Park6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKyle Davidson / Cassidy Hawkins vs Matthew Wright / Sarah Scott6-3, 6-3
2025-07-13vs Cupp/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesKyle Davidson / Brooke Govert vs Jacob Anderson / Lakin Shoaf6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather McKeehan / Jake Abernathy vs Molly Shoaf / Ethan Huber7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelissa Fuesting / Jack Slonecker vs Hayden Wolfgang / Jadyn Parker6-3, 6-2
2025-06-29vs Parks/ScottWon 21
L#1 DoublesPearl Jhala / Jake Abernathy vs Yan Gomes / Jenna Gomes6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrooke Govert / Ryan Miller vs Ashtyn Wright / Matthew Wright7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKyle Davidson / Tanya Davidson vs Daniel Lyngh / Sarah Scott6-2, 6-3
2025-06-24vs Cupp/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather McKeehan / Chris Cook vs Jadyn Parker / Hayden Wolfgang6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrooke Govert / Jake Abernathy vs Lakin Shoaf / Caleb Rodriguez6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCassidy Hawkins / Timothy Eldreth vs Molly Shoaf / Christopher Behan4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed 18&over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Trey Ambrose
published
3.41
Jack Slonecker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Jake Abernathy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Pearl Jhala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Brooke Govert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.00
Cassidy Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Melissa Fuesting
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Heather McKeehan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Tanya Davidson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Timothy Eldreth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trey Ambrose
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Jack Slonecker
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Jake Abernathy
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Pearl Jhala
43W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
3
Brooke Govert
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Cassidy Hawkins
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Melissa Fuesting
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Heather McKeehan
21W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Tanya Davidson
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Timothy Eldreth
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.