Teams

V - Wood Ranch Dukes

2023 USTA Adult 18 &Over - Ventura WE · V - Men 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJason Pivnik / Jay Idea vs Scott Anderson / Richard Gallagher0-6, 2-6
2023-07-01vs V - Mission Oaks FirecrackersLost 01
L#2 DoublesJason Pivnik / Garen Amirganian vs Jack Ramirez / Bradley Johnson4-6, 3-6
2023-06-17vs V - WAC AttackLost 01
L#1 DoublesMel Johnson / Jason Pivnik vs Paul Gianini / Piers Hanbury3-6, 3-6
2023-05-27vs V - Sunset Point 4.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJason Pivnik vs Fred Ackourey3-6, 2-6
2023-05-13vs V - LLW WoodRanchHitmen-D FacianaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Cho / Garen Amirganian vs Mark Lipsky / Eric Bumann2-6, 0-6
2023-04-30vs V - Mission Oaks WarriorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMel Johnson / Jason Pivnik vs Matthew Dawe / Jason Ryder6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-22vs V - Camino CrewLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Heinbecker / Garen Amirganian vs Chris Trama / Harry Mapanda1-6, 6-7
2023-04-16vs V - Libbey Park Chief PeaksLost 01
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Jason Pivnik vs Greg Doss / Dj Pierce6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Cho
published 4
3.63
Peter Heinbecker
published
3.55
Kevin Humfreville
published
3.53
Garen Amirganian
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Jose MacKinney
published
3.42
Jason Pivnik
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Mel Johnson
published
3.26
Rod Shimamoto
published
2.95
Jay Idea
published
Jeff Sutterman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Pivnik + Garen Amirganian7849% games+3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Cho
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Heinbecker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kevin Humfreville
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Garen Amirganian
217W–148L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
Jose MacKinney
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
3.5
Jason Pivnik
32W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
Mel Johnson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Rod Shimamoto
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Jay Idea
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
Jeff Sutterman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.