Teams

Fee - Acquaviva

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-05-07vs Brevard/CampbellLost 05
L#1 DoublesJerry Butler / WILLIAM WOOD vs David Castillo / Cameron Hartnett0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesEvan Alves vs Robert Dini1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Stevens / Mark Klenck vs Vincent Vo / Brian Tran4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesAngelo Joseph vs Tareque Liaquat0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRam Vallabaneni / Sean Bennett vs Jamin Campbell / James Pretorius2-6, 0-6
2026-04-27vs Brevard/CampbellLost 04
L#1 DoublesJerry Butler / WILLIAM WOOD vs David Castillo / Rohit Menghani4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRam Vallabaneni vs Robert Dini0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Dunn / Mark Klenck vs Vincent Vo / Brian Tran4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Stevens / Carl Acquaviva vs Cameron Hartnett / Long Dang6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Angelo Joseph
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Evan Alves
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
WILLIAM WOOD
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Richard Lowe
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Mark Klenck
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Jerry Butler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
David Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.85
Carl Acquaviva
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.85
Robert Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.80
Antonio Cedeno
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Ram Vallabaneni
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carl Acquaviva + David Stevens5354% games+14.2% vs expected
Robert Dunn + David Stevens4644% games−4.1% vs expected
Jerry Butler + WILLIAM WOOD134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angelo Joseph
3W–11L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Evan Alves
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
WILLIAM WOOD
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15
Richard Lowe
9W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
Mark Klenck
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08
Jerry Butler
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.02
3
David Stevens
23W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Carl Acquaviva
22W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Robert Dunn
17W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Antonio Cedeno
3W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Ram Vallabaneni
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.