Teams

MPTC - I'd Hit That

**2026 Team Combo · Ladies 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-30vs South Shore - Baby Got BackhandWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Stryker / Olivia Hu vs Prisca Pungwe / Cathy Ingram6-3, 6-3
2026-08-23vs Sugar Creek - DeucesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiana Gonzalez / Sara Wilks vs Justine Rosner / Linnie Ford1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-16vs LLTC - Double TroubleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephanie Dudzinski / Karen Jensen vs Cathy Leonard / Valeria Tellez6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLynette Mendoza / Chelsea Grear vs Michelle Griffith / Yu Liang2-6, 1-6
2026-08-02vs South Shore - Baby Got BackhandSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChelsea Grear / Liana Gonzalez vs Erika Gruber / Jennifer Gruber4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Barnes / Stephanie Dudzinski vs Laura Fandry / Cathy Ingram3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-02vs Sugar Creek - DeucesLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Dudzinski / Jillian Ermis vs Kelly Exner / Natalie Simmons2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynette Mendoza / Joyce Tiong vs Ashley McCoy / Nicolette Nelson3-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Stryker / Liana Gonzalez vs Deborah Kopp / Brooke Griffith6-1, 6-1
2026-07-26vs LLTC - Double TroubleWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Dudzinski / Kristin Barnes vs Ada Sun / Cathy Leonard6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelissa Stryker / Jillian Ermis vs Michelle Griffith / Katie Horton4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSara Wilks / Karen Jensen vs Adriana Daza / Valeria Tellez6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Ladies 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sugar Creek - Deuces5011411103
2MPTC - I'd Hit That2154864
3South Shore - Baby Got Backhand12451277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Chelsea Grear
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.02
Melissa Stryker
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Joyce Tiong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Stephanie Dudzinski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.95
Chiara Combs
published 4.5
3.91
Elizabeth Zdeblick
published
3.90
Sara Wilks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Olivia Hu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Jillian Ermis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Kristin Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Liana Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Lynette Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tracy Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joyce Tiong + Melissa Stryker5068% games+4.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Zdeblick + Stephanie Dudzinski5456% games−2.2% vs expected
Jillian Ermis + Kristin Barnes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chelsea Grear
39W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
4.04
Melissa Stryker
72W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.02
Joyce Tiong
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
Stephanie Dudzinski
58W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.99
4.5
Chiara Combs
27W–15L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.95
Elizabeth Zdeblick
49W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.91
Sara Wilks
38W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.90
Olivia Hu
72W–65L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.81
Jillian Ermis
53W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.80
Kristin Barnes
37W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Liana Gonzalez
37W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
Lynette Mendoza
53W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Tracy Martin
22W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.