Teams

CV-Cathedral Canyon CC/T Tyra & J Hall

2023 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Men's 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-12-16vs CV-Rancho Las Palmas/Hems & S HallLost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Tyra / David Woods vs Brad Cotten / Douglas Reed1-6, 0-6
2023-11-18vs CV-Rancho Las Palmas/Hems & S HallLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Woods / Mike Witt vs Brad Cotten / Stephen Hall3-6, 4-6
2023-10-21vs CV-Palm Springs TC/ForrestWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Woods / Christopher Oliver vs Jack Peirce / Steven Greenwood6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Light
published 4.5
4.12
Kurtis Magee
published
3.95
Satoru Hidaka
published
3.84
3.70
Nathan Chesbro
published
3.63
Edwin LIEW-FERGUSON
published
3.58
Todd Tyra
published
3.58
Jason Hall
published
3.32
David Woods
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Mark Mangold
published
Mark Ojakian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Light + Kurtis Magee314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Light
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kurtis Magee
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
4.12
Satoru Hidaka
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
Robert Schwarzenbach
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
Nathan Chesbro
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Edwin LIEW-FERGUSON
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Todd Tyra
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jason Hall
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
David Woods
19W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Christopher Prescott
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Mangold
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Ojakian
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.