Teams

TTraub/KMiller (WSRC)

2024 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 8.5 Men - Wed PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-09vs MDriscoll/BHofmann (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Traub / Martin Iles vs Scott Carlton / Joseph Heyward3-6, 1-6
2024-10-02vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMartin Iles / Richard Teat vs Hien Jimmy Nguyen / Ricky Marks4-6, 3-6
2024-09-25vs RCazares/SSwanson (Palisades)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKevin Miller / Richard Teat vs Mike Boston / Keith Gonzales6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMark Griffey / Martin Iles vs Thomas Forrest / Wayne Ernest0-6, 5-7
2024-09-11vs RBredder (Carmel CC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Griffey / Martin Iles vs Neil Handelsman / David Strause4-6, 3-6
2024-09-04vs MDriscoll/BHofmann (Lifetime)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGordon Lowman / Martin Iles vs Rod Hartley / Mike Farley2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Teat / Richard Hinson vs Gary Johnson / Scott Carlton3-6, 1-6
2024-08-07vs RBredder (Carmel CC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMark Griffey / Martin Iles vs Daniel Comisar / Dean Lackey5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLarry McCorkle / Richard Teat vs Scott Starling / David Strause6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 8.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Gordon Lowman
published
3.89
Jeremy Caslin
published
3.87
Randall Miller
published
3.84
Mark Griffey
published 4
3.83
Tom Traub
published
3.81
Richard Teat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Richard Gallagher
published
3.80
Kevin Miller
published
3.66
Martin Iles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Bill Brupbacher
published 4
3.61
Larry McCorkle
published
Richard Hinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Griffey + Jeremy Caslin6355% games−4.9% vs expected
Richard Teat + Martin Iles3355% gamesnot enough data
Mark Griffey + Martin Iles2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gordon Lowman
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94
Jeremy Caslin
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.89
Randall Miller
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Mark Griffey
59W–48L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
Tom Traub
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Richard Teat
91W–66L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Richard Gallagher
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Kevin Miller
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Martin Iles
161W–102L career · 10 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Bill Brupbacher
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Larry McCorkle
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.61
Richard Hinson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.