Teams

TCSP-Quarterpounders-Schneider

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Adam Sherr
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Ephraim Baclagan
published 3
3.06
Kenneth Troop
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results6 ties
2025-05-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesHung Nguyen / Adam Sherr vs Clement Ifrim / Davis Feng6-2, 7-6
2025-05-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesTed Schneider / Adam Sherr vs Justin Khanna / Bill Do6-4, 6-1
2025-04-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesEphraim Baclagan / Adam Sherr vs Ticson MacH / Matias Fernandez7-5, 6-1
2025-04-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEphraim Baclagan / Kenneth Troop vs Scott Lennard / Nick Siska6-2, 6-3
2025-03-30Split 11
L#2 DoublesHung Nguyen / Kenneth Troop vs Mihai Petriuc / Mihail Frintu6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAdam Sherr / Ethan Chung vs Davis Feng / Septimiu Morea6-4, 6-3
2024-12-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNicole Swapp / Kenneth Troop vs Chris Higashi / JOANNE SHUTT6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Adam Sherr
107W–94L career
0%99%0%
3.28
3
Ephraim Baclagan
58W–27L career
0%28%72%
3.18
3.5
Kenneth Troop
97W–61L career
19%81%0%
3.06

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.