Teams

Brewster DAY 6.5 55+

2026 Southern Combo Doubles 55 & Over - DAY LEAGUE - HSV · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-28vs Herbert 6.5 Combo Day 55+Won 21
W#1 DoublesCathy Vanvalkenburgh / Julia Godfrey vs Shannon Lindig / Sheri Rustic6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Perry / Judy Wiles vs Tracy McMahan / Vivian Pannell6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Brewster / Sue Rogers vs Athena Little / Julie Ashcraft2-6, 3-6
2026-08-25vs Herbert 6.5 Combo Day 55+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Kenney / Melissa Haynes vs Lynne Reynolds / Shannon Lindig6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJudy Wiles / Mary Wright vs Shannon Orr / Barbara Doty2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTracy Bond / Cindy Davis vs Tracy McMahan / Beth Berry1-6, 5-7
2026-08-19vs Herbert 6.5 Combo Day 55+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Davis / Elizabeth Kenney vs Lynne Reynolds / Vivian Pannell2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLinda Brewster / Ginger Campbell vs Shannon Lindig / Sheri Rustic2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Perry / Judy Wiles vs Julie Ashcraft / Beth Berry3-6, 3-6
2026-08-14vs Herbert 6.5 Combo Day 55+Won 21
L#1 DoublesJulia Godfrey / Ginger Campbell vs Tracy McMahan / Christine Mannor6-5
W#2 DoublesPeggy Newberry / Cindy Davis vs Shannon Orr / Ellie Sternberg Lastinger7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Kenney / Sue Rogers vs Sheri Rustic / Barbara Doty7-6, 7-5
2026-08-11vs Herbert 6.5 Combo Day 55+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Kenney / Melissa Haynes vs Shannon Orr / Sheri Rustic0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Brewster / Sue Rogers vs Farrow Herbert / Christine Mannor2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary Wright / Peggy Newberry vs Julie Ashcraft / Beth Berry6-1, 6-1
2026-08-07vs Herbert 6.5 Combo Day 55+Won 21
L#1 DoublesCindy Davis / Julia Godfrey vs Shannon Lindig / Lynne Reynolds7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Kenney / Cathy Vanvalkenburgh vs Vivian Pannell / Beth Berry6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Brewster / Tracy Bond vs Barbara Doty / Ellie Sternberg Lastinger6-3, 4-4
2026-08-04vs Herbert 6.5 Combo Day 55+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Haynes / Cathy Vanvalkenburgh vs Shannon Orr / Christine Mannor4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Bond / Debbie Perry vs Lynne Reynolds / Vivian Pannell4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Wright / Marilyn Porter vs Athena Little / Tracy McMahan6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brewster DAY 6.5 55+226613112
2Herbert 6.5 Combo Day 55+226613118

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Julia Godfrey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Elizabeth Kenney
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Judy Wiles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Peggy Newberry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Marilyn Porter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Melissa Haynes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Linda Brewster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Cathy Vanvalkenburgh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Sue Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Tracy Bond
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Debbie Perry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Kenney + Judy Wiles8457% games+5.8% vs expected
Judy Wiles + Linda Brewster61542% games−6.2% vs expected
Sue Rogers + Linda Brewster1437% gamesnot enough data
Cathy Vanvalkenburgh + Elizabeth Kenney123 matchesnot enough data
Judy Wiles + Debbie Perry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Godfrey
25W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Elizabeth Kenney
57W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Judy Wiles
61W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Peggy Newberry
19W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
Marilyn Porter
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.97
Melissa Haynes
48W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Linda Brewster
38W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Cathy Vanvalkenburgh
34W–39L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Sue Rogers
21W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Tracy Bond
9W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Debbie Perry
2W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.