Teams

LCTA18/Hodges/LTP DI

2022 SC - Other 18 & Over Singles League · Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Anita Jain
published 4.5
4.04
Karen Devries
published
4.00
Elyssa Snelgrove
published 4
3.77
Anita Ainsworth
published 4
3.73
Emily Steinfort
published 4
3.72
Annmarie Taggio
published 4
3.69
Wendy Mercado
published
Denise Gosnell
published 3.5
3.08
Brenda Hodges
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anita Jain
34W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
Karen Devries
64W–39L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Elyssa Snelgrove
73W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Anita Ainsworth
34W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Emily Steinfort
30W–22L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Annmarie Taggio
77W–71L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Wendy Mercado
34W–31L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Denise Gosnell
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brenda Hodges
22W–27L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.