Teams

Howitt/YMCA/Foothills

2022 Foothills Spring 18 & Over League · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCarson Helsper vs Madison Shull6-7, 4-6
2022-04-11vs Skoog/Young/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Haan / Carson Helsper vs Jackie Finley / Kathryn Jones3-6, 1-6
2022-04-02vs Oakley/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarson Helsper / Megan Reid vs Chris Summers / Paula Gettys6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCourtney Haan vs Kerri Oakley6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-30vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarson Helsper / Courtney Haan vs DeAnna Finger / Kristi McCall6-2, 7-5
2022-03-09vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarson Helsper / Elise Wright vs DeAnna Finger / Maile Kim2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-03-02vs Skoog/Young/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarson Helsper / Courtney Haan vs Marsha Diamonti / Erika Rowland5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-02-23vs Oakley/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarson Helsper / Megan Reid vs Kate Foster / Lynne Place7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Ellen Stupka
published 4
3.66
3.56
Kelli Schmidt
published
3.45
Carson Helsper
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.38
Courtney Haan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Megan Reid
published
3.29
Elise Wright
published 3.5
3.12
Cori Peters
published 3.5
3.08
Catherine Lundberg
published 3.5
2.66
Olivia Good
published
2.61
DEBORAH OBERLE
published 3
Taylor Newton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carson Helsper + Courtney Haan5152% gamesnot enough data
Megan Reid + Carson Helsper224 matchesnot enough data
Megan Reid + Elise Wright213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ellen Stupka
73W–37L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Charlotte Hartman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Kelli Schmidt
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Carson Helsper
144W–110L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Courtney Haan
132W–112L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Megan Reid
25W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Elise Wright
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Cori Peters
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Catherine Lundberg
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Olivia Good
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
DEBORAH OBERLE
3W–16L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Taylor Newton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.