Teams

Dillard/Fayetteville/SRC

2025 Adult Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-21vs Gilbert/Bentonville/KTCWon 20
W#2 SinglesJamia Weir vs MALLORY LOWE6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesNatalie Mayer vs Michelle Gilbert6-3, 6-0
2026-02-11vs Bova/Bella Vista/MRCLost 12
L#1 SinglesMyra Dallas vs Sherry Fitzgerald6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJamia Weir vs Jennifer Burleson6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJennifer Lynn vs Kat Bova4-6, 2-6
2026-02-08vs King/Fayetteville/FACWon 21
W#1 SinglesNatalie Mayer vs Robin Wise6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJamia Weir vs Melissa King6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJennifer Lynn vs Jenna Donnell1-6, 1-6
2026-02-06vs Letts/Rogers/SVCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesJamia Weir vs Laurie Letts6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesGwendy Lefforge vs Deanna Cicatiello6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSherri Dillard vs Judith Cicatiello6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-01Won 30
W#1 SinglesJamia Weir vs Lyndsey Weber6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMyra Dallas vs Melissa King6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesGwendy Lefforge vs Susan Murray6-4, 6-2
2026-01-11vs Webb/Bentonville/PCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesJamia Weir vs Melissa Ocarroll4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJennifer Lynn vs Suzanne Lankford0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesGwendy Lefforge vs Carrie Overton5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Kristy Maher
published
3.40
Natalie Mayer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.37
Jamia Weir
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Gwendy Lefforge
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Sherri Dillard
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Myra Dallas
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.56
Jennifer Lynn
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristy Maher + Sherri Dillard4552% games−3.3% vs expected
Gwendy Lefforge + Sherri Dillard5447% games−3.6% vs expected
Gwendy Lefforge + Kristy Maher303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy Maher
31W–21L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Natalie Mayer
54W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Jamia Weir
41W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Gwendy Lefforge
20W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Sherri Dillard
22W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.07
Myra Dallas
25W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Jennifer Lynn
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.