Teams

SD LLW 8.0 Vintage @SDTRC/ Atwood

2026 Mixed Doubles 55 & Over Spring- Combined SD · SDNC

15 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-16vs SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ BrutonWon 20
W#2 DoublesScott Atwood / Jennie Blacker vs Michael Donahue / Ping Chen6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Milburn / Jeffrey Bertolini vs Steve Firestone / Haruko Vajda7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-02vs SD 8.0 Coronado HS- TC/ WebsterWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Milburn / Davis Nacamu vs Kellie McMullen / Todd Hoyt6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesScott Atwood / Jennie Blacker vs Wanda Jurlina / Theodore Gilmore6-3, 6-4
2026-04-18vs SD 8.0 Balboa TC/ SpragueWon 10
W#1 DoublesGladys Esponda / Scott Atwood vs Zhuoling Jia / Erwin Guzman6-3, 6-1
2026-04-11vs SD 8.0 Coronado HS- TC/ WebsterWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Atwood / Soledad Ramirez vs Kellie McMullen / Todd Hoyt6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesScott Atwood / Gladys Esponda vs Jeffrey Ackley / Sara Ackley6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · SDNC
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SDNC LLW 8.0 Rangers @KCP/ Warren802227139
2SD LLW 8.0 Vintage @SDTRC/ Atwood712139151
3SDNC 8.0 FRCC/ Federhart7118614152
4SDNC 8.0 Volley Llamas @MCC/ Yim7118618205
5SDNC 8.0 Miramar College/ Ishihara53141023202
6SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ Bruton44131127231
7SDNC 8.0 RSFTC/ Morris44101431243
8SD 8.0 Coronado HS- TC/ Webster44101432232
9SD 8.0 Balboa TC/ Sprague35111330219
10SDNC 8.0 El Camino CC/ Guiltner35101431236
11SDNC 8.0 Lomas Santa Fe CC/ Tumini2661837266
12SDNC 8.0 La Valle CC/ Manheim1751939276
13SDNC 8.0 Carmel Valley Tennis/ Kuba1751940258
14SDNC 8.0 San Dieguito TC/ Froyd0842043269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Linda Milburn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Eric Dahms
published 4
4.01
Marc Channick
published 4
3.96
Yvonne Angyal
published 4.5
3.86
Scott Atwood
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.84
Yusuf Yazici
published 4
3.84
Gladys Esponda
published 4
3.83
Tim Pillow
published 4
3.77
Sami Martinez
published 4
3.75
Soledad Ramirez
published 4
3.70
Helen Beran
published 4
3.58
Jennie Blacker
published 4
3.52
Jeffrey Bertolini
published 3.5
3.46
Davis Nacamu
published 3.5
Charles Angyal
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yvonne Angyal + Marc Channick7163% gamesnot enough data
Gladys Esponda + Scott Atwood6071% gamesnot enough data
Tim Pillow + Helen Beran4157% gamesnot enough data
Yvonne Angyal + Jeffrey Bertolini2347% gamesnot enough data
Sami Martinez + Marc Channick404 matchesnot enough data
Tim Pillow + Gladys Esponda404 matchesnot enough data
Gladys Esponda + Eric Dahms314 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Blacker + Scott Atwood404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Milburn
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
4
Eric Dahms
13W–15L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
4.16
4
Marc Channick
202W–81L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
4.5
Yvonne Angyal
134W–127L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.96
Scott Atwood
18W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Yusuf Yazici
31W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Gladys Esponda
156W–89L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Tim Pillow
50W–69L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Sami Martinez
33W–31L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Soledad Ramirez
114W–102L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Helen Beran
98W–83L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Jennie Blacker
37W–54L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Jeffrey Bertolini
65W–65L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Davis Nacamu
7W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Charles Angyal
0W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.