Teams

BC-MCC/KristieSherrill

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-05vs BC-AltaVista/SondeeWolffWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnie Han / Mojgan Vakili vs Kitty Fitzgerald / Tracey Cloud6-2, 6-1
2023-10-29vs BC-SouthEnd/DebbieTranWon 10
W#1 DoublesMojgan Vakili / Christine Mancini vs Melina Symons / Suzanne Scott6-3, 6-1
2023-10-08vs BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderianWon 10
W#1 DoublesMojgan Vakili / Anna Womack vs Terri Diamond / Elizabeth Rogers6-1, 6-2
2023-10-01vs BC-BJKTC/KatyWongLost 01
L#2 DoublesMojgan Vakili / Christine Mancini vs Katherine Wong / Elena Salinas0-6, 5-7
2023-09-10vs BC-AltaVista/KarieLantermanLost 01
L#1 DoublesTeal Levine / Mojgan Vakili vs Gretchen Albarian / Pamela Hayes4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Angela Dax
published 4
3.69
Denise Coit
published 4
3.68
Faye Cavanaugh
published
3.55
Melissa Crowley
published
3.45
Mojgan Vakili
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.38
Kristie Sherrill
published
3.34
Leah Duke
published
3.32
Christine Mancini
published 3.5
3.30
Theresa Vendetti
published
3.30
Annie Han
published 3.5
3.27
Carre Porter
published 3.5
3.23
Jennie MacKechnie
published
3.14
Tamara Smith
published
3.10
Aubrey Sedberry
published 3.5
3.08
Teal Levine
published
Jessica Moffett
published
Tina Wu
published
Yvonne Stevens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carre Porter + Christine Mancini303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Dax
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Denise Coit
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Faye Cavanaugh
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Melissa Crowley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
Mojgan Vakili
80W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45
Kristie Sherrill
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Leah Duke
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Christine Mancini
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Theresa Vendetti
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Annie Han
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Carre Porter
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennie MacKechnie
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Tamara Smith
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Aubrey Sedberry
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Teal Levine
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jessica Moffett
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Wu
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yvonne Stevens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.