Teams

B2 Burkwood McKelvey

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Weeknight Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-18vs B5 Avalon Ghita 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesSam McKelvey / Adam Decker vs Ayush Gandhi / Ronnie Erice0-2
2021-06-03vs B3 Hermitage Fisher/StuckeyWon 20
W#1 DoublesSam McKelvey / Billy Fulwider vs Kurt Williams / Christopher Chandler3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdam Decker / Tom Newton vs KENJI SAKAMOTO / John Chenault V7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-27vs B1 Westwood Mulholland FrankNMoleWon 20
W#1 SinglesSam McKelvey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMario Wright / Adam Decker vs Memo Maquivar / Andrew Cecil6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-20vs B7 Raintree StoneWon 10
W#3 DoublesAdam Decker / Tom Newton vs Gary Wills / Joe Lacroix6-1, 7-5
2021-05-13vs B4 ACAC Stephens Assault 4.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesNorman Howland / Adam Decker vs Steve Hamant / William Price4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSam McKelvey vs Doug Okay2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-29vs B6 MAC CousinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSam McKelvey / Billy Fulwider vs Adam Hamilton / Nicholas Smith6-3, 6-3
2021-04-22vs B7 Raintree StoneSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAdam Decker / Norman Howland vs Michael McMillen / Joe Lacroix7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSam McKelvey vs Geoff Campbell4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-04-15vs B5 Avalon Ghita 4.0Split 11
W#2 SinglesSam McKelvey vs Jay Munya6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdam Decker / Norman Howland vs Alex Neuwelt / Terrance Milo3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weeknight Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Billy Fulwider
published 4.5
3.96
Keith Harvey
published
3.86
Adam Decker
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.78
Sam McKelvey
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.65
Tom Newton
published
3.62
Michael Hazelwood
published
3.46
Mario Wright
published
Chad Eldridge
published 3.5
Henry Rosenbaum
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Decker + Sam McKelvey6153% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Billy Fulwider
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.22
Keith Harvey
16W–11L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Adam Decker
149W–62L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Sam McKelvey
158W–91L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
Tom Newton
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
Mario Wright
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Chad Eldridge
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Henry Rosenbaum
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.