Teams

Hit Talkers

2025 Combo 40 & Over-SW · Women 6.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-14vs NetherlandLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimmie Polk / Anna Giust vs Staci Anding / Melissa Leggett4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPeggy Givens / Beth Smith vs Rockie Netherland / Cindy Foster2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPeggy Polk / Laura Murray vs Sandy Winborne / Kelly Perkins7-6, 6-4
2025-09-30vs NetherlandLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffani Ferguson / Lisa Breazeale vs Dwana Wright / Janell Weekley7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Murray / Peggy Givens vs Paige Sullivan / Courtney Owens2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDeanna Howington / Anna Giust vs Sandy Winborne / Kelly Perkins4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-25vs Upshaw NatchezWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeanna Howington / Beth Smith vs Wealthia Jackson / Bonita Upshaw6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Murray / Peggy Givens vs Annie Pierce / Lisa Dale6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Deanna Howington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Anna Giust
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Peggy Givens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Peggy Polk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Lisa Breazeale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kimmie Polk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leanne Summers
published
Tiffani Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Giust + Peggy Givens4350% gamesnot enough data
Anna Giust + Kimmie Polk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deanna Howington
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91
3
Anna Giust
24W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Peggy Givens
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Peggy Polk
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Lisa Breazeale
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Kimmie Polk
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leanne Summers
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffani Ferguson
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.