Teams

Plantation Dipierro

2026 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter · 8.0 W Thursday

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-12vs River Strand CurleWon 21
L#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Janet Kramer vs Annmarie Curle / Kim Reiser4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesYvonne Walker / Diane DeGurian vs Kara Beene / Nancy Finman6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Horne / Ellen Lori Smith MD vs Judi Wilson / Barbara Aichinger6-4, 6-3
2026-03-05vs LBK Public Island GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Horne / Yvonne Walker vs Karen Adams / Mary Jane Waite0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesClaudia Schmidt / Valerie Lansdale vs Margaret West / Sandra Duryea2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-26vs Lake Club A Swing and A PrayerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Nora Saxe vs Jacqueline Borden / Laura Severson7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Horne / Valerie Lansdale vs Karen Dale / Cynthia Streibich0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesYvonne Walker / Theresa Watson vs Debra Hair / Marlene Searle6-3, 6-2
2026-02-19vs LWR SosaWon 20
W#2 DoublesJanet Kramer / Claudia Schmidt vs Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom / Jane Doe6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Horne / Valerie Lansdale vs Bernadette Waterman / Sheila Sosa6-2, 7-6
2026-02-18vs Palm Aire SeiderLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Crews / Janet Kramer vs Lynn Deuitch / Kristin Knous4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Joy Voke / Carrie Carretta2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Yvonne Walker vs Susan Kimball / Donna Hannigan6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-12vs Lakewood National HarperLost 12
L#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Cindy Markowitz / Mary Gill5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Crews / Janet Kramer vs Sandy Harper / Kelly Depalo4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Yvonne Walker vs Abigail Stephens / Jodi Fields7-6, 6-2
2026-01-29vs Waterford LamyWon 30
W#1 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs SueAnn Sanders / Carla Rodman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNora Saxe / Diane Crews vs Mary Schmitz / Barbara Belanger6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJanet Kramer / Claudia Schmidt vs Lynn Inganamort / Deanna Allard6-3, 6-2
2026-01-22vs LWR HagopianSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Yvonne Walker vs Heidi Cox / Christine Handel6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAna Areosa / Janet Kramer vs Gina Hagopian / Sheila Perry6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-01-21vs Sarasota/DavyWon 21
W#1 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs Jennifer Butcher / Sheila Engert6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Crews / Janet Kramer vs Marsha Timm / Nancy Moran6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNora Saxe / Claudia Schmidt vs Linda Radovich / Nicole Thompson7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Diane DeGurian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.89
Ana Areosa
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.79
Diane Crews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Claudia Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Connie Weiss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Theresa Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Valerie Lansdale
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Yvonne Walker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ellen Lori Smith MD
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Kramer
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Nancy Horne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nora Saxe
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Areosa + Janet Kramer314 matchesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Connie Weiss224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane DeGurian
8W–10L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
4
Ana Areosa
139W–118L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Claudia Schmidt
34W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Connie Weiss
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Theresa Watson
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Valerie Lansdale
46W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Yvonne Walker
136W–87L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
Ellen Lori Smith MD
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Horne
32W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nora Saxe
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.