Teams

LNH:RacquetsUp:Bouressa

2022 NH Adult 40 & Over Women Day · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-21vs GH:WinniGirls:Joyce:ShegogWon 31
L#1 DoublesGabrielle Green / Janice Wiegman vs Heidi Bourgeois / Maureen Joyce3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesHeajung Kim-Aiello vs Jolie Hassler7-6, 6-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Dundas / Patricia Halpin vs Julie Ciaraldi / Paula Spencer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChris Bouressa / Kathryn Prolman vs Sue Ross / PETRICE RANNO6-3, 6-0
2022-06-14vs CON:Krushers:Rauseo:RadosWon 31
W#1 DoublesChris Bouressa / Patricia Halpin vs Heidi Waite / Cathleen Desmarais6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJessica Ackerman vs Michelle Gould4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanice Wiegman / Elizabeth Dundas vs Heather Klein / Juanita Richard6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGloria Morison / Jane Peterson vs Mary Kruzel / Doris Long7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-07vs RVC:GoodGollyMsVolley:Gantrish:AradoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Green / Chris Bouressa vs Lynn Dolan / Alison Gorman6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJessica Ackerman vs Allegra Lubrano1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Halpin / Kathryn Prolman vs Sae-Im Smith / Susan Valence6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Wiegman / Gloria Clancy vs Beth Boyle / Amy Dexter4-6, 3-6
2022-05-31vs HH:Weisberg:WalkerLost 12
L#1 DoublesGabrielle Green / Patricia Halpin vs Jessica Weisberg / Kimberly Bogle2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJanice Wiegman / Elizabeth Dundas vs Zola Brown / Jocelyn Jones6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChris Bouressa / Jessica Ackerman vs Elsa Galvez / Jane Graffum6-2, 6-1
2022-05-24vs MTS:Scharpf:NippeLost 04
L#1 DoublesHeajung Kim-Aiello / Gabrielle Green vs Heidi Saghir / Kimberly Valeri5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGloria Morison vs Aimee Ayers2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Halpin / Janice Wiegman vs Sharon Goolbis / Debbie Marino6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Dundas / Kathryn Prolman vs Rebecca Helme / Jane Frawley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-17vs GH:WinniGirls:Joyce:ShegogLost 04
L#1 DoublesChris Bouressa / Gabrielle Green vs Betsy Chapin / Maureen Joyce3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJane Peterson vs Heidi Bourgeois4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Wiegman / Elizabeth Dundas vs Martina Lord / Julie Ciaraldi3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Halpin / Gloria Clancy vs PETRICE RANNO / Jennifer Kelley2-6, 1-6
2022-05-10vs CON:Krushers:Rauseo:RadosLost 13
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Dundas / Patricia Halpin vs Brigitte Cook / Juanita Richard6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKimberly Caron vs Michelle Gould6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeajung Kim-Aiello / Jane Peterson vs Cathleen Desmarais / Heidi Waite2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGloria Clancy / Kathryn Prolman vs Laurie Rauseo / Marie Stevens4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesChris Bouressa / Jan Goplerud vs Alison Gorman / Helen Ainsworth6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJessica Ackerman vs Jen Gantrish7-6, 3-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Halpin / Elizabeth Dundas vs Aileen Chaltain / Sae-Im Smith6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Caron / Janice Wiegman vs Amy Dexter / Mary Teachout4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-26vs HH:Weisberg:WalkerLost 13
W#1 DoublesChris Bouressa / Jan Goplerud vs Jessica Weisberg / Kimberly Bogle6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHeajung Kim-Aiello vs Sue Ries2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJanice Wiegman / Kathryn Prolman vs Jocelyn Jones / Tiani Coleman3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Dundas / Gloria Clancy vs Elsa Galvez / Jane Graffum3-6, 4-6
2022-04-19vs MTS:Scharpf:NippeLost 13
L#1 DoublesJan Goplerud / Patricia Halpin vs Kimberly Valeri / Heidi Saghir2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Ackerman vs Aimee Ayers0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Wiegman / Elizabeth Dundas vs Cathleen Scharpf / Sharon Goolbis2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathryn Prolman / Jane Peterson vs Nancy Donahue / Debbie Marino6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EXE:Maye:Braasch01033721257
2GH:WinniGirls:Joyce:Shegog01032829321
3YMCA:ConwayNelson:Murray010271335342
4HH:Weisberg:Walker010251537336
5MTS:Scharpf:Nippe010211946363
6LNH:RacquetsUp:Bouressa010162452385
7WWCC:Tidebreakers: Zimmerman:Freund010172352385
8HSB:Weidknecht010162455386
9CON:Krushers:Rauseo:Rados010142657400
10RVC:GoodGollyMsVolley:Gantrish:Arado010122861413
11GB:Merida:Quinn01093166431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Jessica Ackerman
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.38
Patricia Halpin
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.33
Kimberly Caron
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Chris Bouressa
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.26
Heajung Kim-Aiello
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Gloria Morison
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Gabrielle Green
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.11
Jan Goplerud
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Jane Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.99
Elizabeth Dundas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.82
Kathryn Prolman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gloria Clancy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Janice Wiegman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Bouressa + Patricia Halpin5261% games+11.2% vs expected
Chris Bouressa + Jane Peterson6257% games+9.3% vs expected
Patricia Halpin + Elizabeth Dundas12558% games+8.3% vs expected
Chris Bouressa + Heajung Kim-Aiello4354% games+6.5% vs expected
Heajung Kim-Aiello + Gabrielle Green5552% games+4.1% vs expected
Patricia Halpin + Gabrielle Green5357% games+3.5% vs expected
Chris Bouressa + Jan Goplerud9353% games+3.5% vs expected
Chris Bouressa + Gabrielle Green6457% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Ackerman
62W–51L career · 6 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Patricia Halpin
56W–45L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Kimberly Caron
36W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Chris Bouressa
89W–56L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Heajung Kim-Aiello
56W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Gloria Morison
152W–113L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Gabrielle Green
34W–31L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jan Goplerud
48W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Jane Peterson
36W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Elizabeth Dundas
32W–37L career · 9 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Kathryn Prolman
34W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.82
3
Gloria Clancy
18W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Janice Wiegman
28W–37L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.