Teams

Greenhill/Ohl M4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT M Saturday · M4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-22vs Garland/Tomalin-Amacher M4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesChris Burton / Jerry Palacioz vs Todd Amacher / Guy Josselyn6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Payn vs Bob Williams6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMasayuki Tada / Greg Ohl vs James Tobey / Raymond Loop6-3, 6-4
2025-02-22vs Panther Creek HS/Lopez-Salvosa M4.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesJerry Palacioz / Pekka Varis vs Ryan Livengood / Gustavo Lopez6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Shipley vs Navin Rana6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChris Burton / Kendrick Terry vs Bernd Mueller / Sarosh Nayar3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNikolay Frolov / Jeffrey Payn vs Bernard Salvosa / Mohan Vasa1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Masayuki Tada
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Chris Burton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Jerry Palacioz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
David Shipley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Nikolay Frolov
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Pekka Varis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
John Spence
published
3.70
Peter Jayroe
published
3.69
Andrew Richter
published 4
3.66
Kendrick Terry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Jeffrey Payn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.55
Dean McSherry
published 4
Greg Ohl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Payn + Nikolay Frolov3349% games−4.0% vs expected
John Spence + Pekka Varis213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Richter + Nikolay Frolov303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Masayuki Tada
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Chris Burton
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Jerry Palacioz
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
David Shipley
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Nikolay Frolov
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Pekka Varis
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
John Spence
24W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Peter Jayroe
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Andrew Richter
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Kendrick Terry
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Jeffrey Payn
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Dean McSherry
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Greg Ohl
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.