Teams

McClelland

2022 Harford Adult 18 & Over · Harford Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-22vs Barry/FreeseSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Bonnie Keating vs Alice Puckett / Danielle Barry7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary McClelland / Marianne Michels vs Theresa Hodge / Elizabeth Nguyen1-6, 6-7
2022-06-21vs Barry/FreeseWon 20
W#1 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Bonnie Keating vs Theresa Hodge / Geri Riley6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNatalie Bryson / Marianne Michels vs Laurie Freese / Eeva Stenger6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-16vs Barry/FreeseLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary McClelland / Melanie Goss vs Laurie Freese / Danielle Barry3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-14vs Barry/FreeseWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Joanne Holehouse vs Sydney James / Carolyn Wescott6-1, 6-0
2022-06-08vs Barry/FreeseWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelanie Goss / Joanne Holehouse vs Elizabeth Nguyen / Joan Garlow6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Merve Gurlu vs Geri Riley / Laurie Klapka6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-23vs Barry/FreeseLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanne Holehouse / Marianne Michels vs Elizabeth Nguyen / Joan Garlow3-6, 2-6
2022-05-16vs Barry/FreeseSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMelanie Goss vs Danielle Barry4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMerve Gurlu / Terri Mrozinski vs Cathy Preisendorfer / Eeva Stenger6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Harford Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Natalie Bryson
published
3.78
Bonnie Keating
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Karla Cachiaras
published
3.71
Mary McClelland
published
3.69
Marianne Michels
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Melanie Goss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.27
Terri Mrozinski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Alyssa McMahon
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Keating + Terri Mrozinski726052% games+3.1% vs expected
Marianne Michels + Terri Mrozinski3452% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Bryson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
Bonnie Keating
243W–234L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Karla Cachiaras
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Mary McClelland
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Marianne Michels
173W–213L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Melanie Goss
51W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Terri Mrozinski
366W–431L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Alyssa McMahon
no matches on record · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.