Teams

DAVIE STADIUM 18AW3.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

24 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Harish Natarajan
published 4.5
3.92
Tammi Hodsdon
published
3.92
Jasmine Morgan
published
3.62
Tuesdai Powers
published
3.53
Angela Logan
published 4
3.51
Rachel Falk
published
3.45
Clairessa Brown
published 3.5
3.43
Sanna Garcia
published
3.38
Minh Cannon
published
3.37
3.27
Patti Presto
published
3.21
Tinara Choing
published
3.11
Florence Huang
published 3.5
3.08
Vanya Georgieva
published
2.97
Laura Herbert
published
2.97
Andrea Akel
published 3
2.96
Patty Ly
published
2.93
Meilan Liu
published
2.92
Daljeet Singh
published 3.5
Amanda Coggins
published 3
2.52
Susan Levy
published
Kathleen Olson
published
Mayra Dominguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daljeet Singh + Sanna Garcia044 matchesnot enough data
Patti Presto + Minh Cannon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Harish Natarajan
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Tammi Hodsdon
27W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
Jasmine Morgan
21W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.92
Tuesdai Powers
24W–30L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Angela Logan
28W–22L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Rachel Falk
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Clairessa Brown
23W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Sanna Garcia
13W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Minh Cannon
61W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Patti Presto
25W–29L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Tinara Choing
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Laurel Anderson-Malinovsky
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Florence Huang
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
Vanya Georgieva
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Laura Herbert
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Andrea Akel
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.97
Patty Ly
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Meilan Liu
10W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.93
3.5
Daljeet Singh
3W–25L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Amanda Coggins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Levy
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52
Kathleen Olson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mayra Dominguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.