Teams

SD LLW HT UCRC/ Carmichael

2024 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WE- Summer SD · SDNC

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Madalyn Moore
published
4.51
Ana Seelinger
published 5
4.36
Caroline Emhardt
published 4.5
4.19
Hillary Park
published 4.5
4.19
Jacqueline Chafe
published 4.5
4.08
Sarena Talbert
published 4.5
4.08
Tami Burns
published
4.06
3.87
Kathleen Keh
published 4
3.83
Grace Ogihara
published 4
3.77
Yan Hoang
published 4
3.55
Paola Romo
published
Rene Carmichael
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Mittermiller + Grace Ogihara15758% games+12.2% vs expected
Kathleen Keh + Claire Mittermiller7357% games+7.6% vs expected
Hillary Park + Ana Seelinger12256% gamesnot enough data
Ana Seelinger + Caroline Emhardt7263% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Chafe + Sarena Talbert314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madalyn Moore
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
4.64
5
Ana Seelinger
186W–59L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.51
4.5
Caroline Emhardt
54W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
4.36
4.5
Hillary Park
67W–41L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Jacqueline Chafe
97W–71L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Sarena Talbert
182W–133L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
Tami Burns
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
4
Claire Mittermiller
81W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Kathleen Keh
64W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Grace Ogihara
69W–48L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Yan Hoang
62W–30L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Paola Romo
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Rene Carmichael
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.