Teams

SV NAVY

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-07vs VCC YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaurie Lehmann / Jill Nabena vs Karen Leach / Stacy Johnson3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLorri Basile vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-31vs SH TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesWhitney Coakley / Laurie Lehmann vs Kristin Mccarty / Brigette Denning6-4, 6-4
2023-08-24vs HG GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesWhitney Coakley / Jill Nabena vs Jodi Roberts / Sara Katt6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLorri Basile vs Margaret Bradley6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaurie Lehmann / Betsy Tapp vs Stefania Scott / Heidi Custer4-6, 4-6
2023-08-17vs KNO SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesLorri Basile / Whitney Coakley vs Molly Ehlinger / Katrina Prutch6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaurie Lehmann / Betsy Tapp vs Diane Klepacka / Margaret Collins6-1, 6-2
2023-08-10vs SS-LT GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesCynthia Boyce / Whitney Coakley vs Nicki Erdle / Laurie Heath6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLorri Basile / Laurie Lehmann vs Jean Finegan / Theresa Schuster4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-03vs WC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Lehmann / Jill Nabena vs Caitlin Buckingham / Monica Feldman4-6, 6-7
2023-07-27vs CCV GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Nabena / Laurie Lehmann vs Ilana Reed / Karrie Fletcher6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesWhitney Coakley vs Kali Henderson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Whitney Coakley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.60
Lorri Basile
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Betsy Tapp
published 3
2.27
Laurie Lehmann
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.18
Diane Bailey
published 2.5
2.11
Cynthia Boyce
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorri Basile + Whitney Coakley9359% games+5.4% vs expected
Lorri Basile + Laurie Lehmann111647% games+3.1% vs expected
Betsy Tapp + Lorri Basile0539% games−7.6% vs expected
Betsy Tapp + Laurie Lehmann11134% games−9.7% vs expected
Cynthia Boyce + Diane Bailey134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Whitney Coakley
46W–15L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Lorri Basile
44W–68L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Betsy Tapp
4W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Laurie Lehmann
51W–78L career · 7 lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Diane Bailey
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Cynthia Boyce
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.